Fun logic puzzle for today. There are 111 people in a competition. The competition has 4 boxes and 4 jewels. Each box is identical and is completely opaque (i.e. you cannot see inside the box once it is closed). The jewels are all different: diamond, ruby, emerald and topaz. Everyone in the competition knows this. The host (who is NOT one of the 111 taking part), places one jewel in each box and then seals the boxes and writes a letter on each box: A, B, C and D - all done WITHOUT any of the 111 competitors watching. The competitors are then asked to guess which jewel is in which box.
- 9 people get all 4 of their guess wrong - 15 people guess exactly one jewel correctly - 25 people guess exactly 2 jewels correctly How many people: a) guess exactly 3 jewels correctly b) guess exactly 4 jewels correctly
Oh dear.
:)
this is based purely on logical reasoning - no complicated maths involved. :)
I am bowing out, I shall no longer strain my brain for this :P
fair enough - but I warn you - you WILL kick yourself when you find out the answer. :)
Well there ARE 64 people left.... But how are you supposed to know which is which?
64?
62.....
I meant 62
Sorry, did it in my head, mental math is not so good :p
:)
o.o.... I don't know how your supposed to know, unless there is some pattern.
no patterns involved - just pure reasoning :)
So, just to make sure I understand, there is no mathematical way to do this, it's just reasoning.
you don't need to use any particular mathematical method - just pure reasoning should get you to the answer.
pay close attention to the question and to what is being asked for...
Wow. I really don't know. I'll probably be upset for not thinking of it once you tell us, but I give up for now. When will you tell us??
I'll give it another hour - if no one solves by then I'll post the solution.
HINT: Pay close attention to the word EXACTLY
a)0 b)62
a 42 b 20 just guessing? xD
@ig0p0g0 wins! :)
wat
it is impossible to guess EXACTLY 3 correct - the remaining 4th jewel MUST also be correct. :)
Please explain??
*facepalm*
Ok now I feel stupid :(
@UsaChan<3 I explained above - hopefully you understood the reasoning.
@thomaster YOU are anything BUT stupid my friend! :)
Oh for the love of god....
:D
*begins to kick himself*
I /believe/ this may be a question that Microsoft use in their interviews (or at least some variation of it)
OMG......I didn't even think of that
Oh, yes I did understand the reasoning, I just didn't see that post when ever I posted mine.
And yes, that is very clever. Haha, I can't believe I didn't see that.
It's a nie little teaser - catches out a lot of people. Surprisingly (or maybe not) - most youngsters get this fairly quickly (under 16 years of age)!
*nice
dont tell me young kids get this quick.....it makes me feel stupid...lol
I feel slightly dunce-ish after that. I feel as though we all should have gotten that. Yay for over-complicating things.... -"if I take the integral of this then...."
he he - not "seeing" something immediately is something we ALL suffer from in life - it doesn't mean that we are stupid - just means that we are human. :D
I tried several things...charts, equations, venn diagrams....AHHHHHHHHHH
maybe that is why most youngsters get it quickly - because they haven't been "corrupted" by equations, charts, etc. :D
so true...lol....I am giving you a medal for this
thx :)
first time I have been medalled for making people feel stupid! :D
These trick questions are awesome :P How about this one: On my way to St. Ives I saw a man with 7 wives. Each wife had 7 sacks. Each sack had 7 cats. Each cat had 7 kittens. Kitten, cats, sacks, wives. How many were going to St. Ives?
\[7+7^4\]?
Depends on if he was walking to or from St. Ives.
to
plus 1
\(8+7^4\)
plus 1 again!
\(9+7^4\)
Also depends on whether or not his wives were with him.
on his way he saw those 7 wives and stuff the question doesn't say that those 7 wives were also heading to st ives. So the answer is 1. only himself xD
grumble grumble grumble... :D
No where does it say they weren't heading to St. Ives either. And technically speaking, if that's your reasoning, the answer would be 0 since you specified "Kitten, cats, sacks, wives" and not "men"
true :)
Hmm it's from a microsoft interview, and it is true they should have used humans instead of wives :P
are you saying that wives are NOT humans! :D
I'm saying wives are also humans, just as the man
One of my professors this past year accidentally implied that in person. It was funny in an unfortunate sort of way,
I know @thomaster - I was trying to make a joke from your statement - English is a language that can easily be mis interpreted!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!