I need help with #2. Medal will be rewarded if work is shown or work is explained correctly and accurately.
@hartnn Please help here, thanks :)
I tried to make the questions clear and focused, it's really hard, my camera sucks
you need just the statements, right ? .....what i would have done is searched the net...
Well it's in the highlighted part. I did Part A - D, I just needed them checked
I really need help with letter E first, I think A - D are correct
i think B should be if two lines and a transversal form corresponding angles that are congruent, then the two lines are parallel
No your B is too complicated
i couldn't find the inverse....is your inverse correct ?
yes, because it makes more sense
If the corresponding angle have the same measure, then the parallel lines are cut by a transversal
naah, doesn't make sense to me ....at all....
ok, and i got the inverse statement if parallel lines are NOT cut by........will NOT have the same measure
Well you're thinking too hard look at the first link where I hightlighted everything in orange
for the converse part ?
You got B off of Yahoo Answers
i searched how to find converse....and that happened to match with yahoo answers
they are wanting the converse from the worksheet not from on-line, not saying you're wrong, but your converse of CAP is too complicated to comprehend
when there's something like p-> q the converse will be q->p
yes I am well aware of that
p is : lines are parallel
Let's work on E NOT B
ok
that's the one I don't have an answer for
i would like to modify my inverse statement if non-parallel lines are cut by a transversal then corresponding angles will not have same measure we will validate this
ok ?
i got it
how will we validate this and show illustrations for it
by taking 2 non-parallel lines |dw:1378959624336:dw|
so we should show that a is not = b|dw:1378959692928:dw|
how did u prove the corresponding angles postulate ? we should use same method to validate this
I used the same method you had, but moved my lines down more
did u prove corr angles postulate using similar triangles?
uh what are you talking about it
I am not using triangles
yeah, there r different methods...so if i would have used similar triangles to validate, you wouldn't get it... so thats why i asked how is that postulate proved in your text
yea
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!