Really love OpenStudy, however, I think there should be a collaboration system. Where between two (or your choice of how many OS developers) users. So and then problems can be privately discussed with the showing of the work.. Basically collaboration should allow users to draw on a 'whiteboard' and draw out problems and how they solved it to get help, then the other user can take control and edit and discuss any mistakes or errors they have made, if any. This would be used for math I'd be guessing. Tell me what you think. Thanks! @hartnn @Preetha @amistre64 Tell me what you think! :)
I think that is a smart idea, Skiller8860. It's kind of like tutoring, and I would totally do that if that was available.
Thanks @elliecosme :)
Hehe, no problem! c:
Almost like a breakout room, right?
That is a great idea!! Ohmigod that would be perfect!!
I think that's a perfect idea. It should definitely be done Skiller!
When I read this I thought about a private section of OS since not everyone would be welcome. But nonetheless it sounds like great idea.
A room to collaborate and discuss things. Instead of filling the one topic with "Let's go over lessons, etc" plus it'll be easier to show the work than spamming a post to go over a simple lesson or subject.
Its a good idea except people with bad intentions and wanted to "troll" could really take advantage of that.
Then they get kicked out ^^
Or reported or blocked :P
Thanks everyone. @Dragan96 , this is basically a private session. It's going to be a private session that two people can be 'invited' or something to. Not sure how OS developers. would go-about doing this. Also, @Ashleyisakitty Good point indeed, however they could be as Dragan96 just stated, "Reported or blocked". I wouldn't see what's the point of trolling on a 'whiteboard' when all you can do is draw problems and stuff, but it can be moderated somehow if needed I'm sure.
A few moderators could stop by? They could be the overall mod of a certain chat room
Possibly somehow OpenStudy can log the collaboration session(s). Not sure how this will be, because I think in order to make a writable object with two users allowed to write on a page, you need to use Adobe Flash.. But I'm sure it is possibly.
Regardless, it can still be moderated. Also I was just now thinking maybe with a "Clear page" button and a "Text" tool in case someone can not read the text that was wrote on the 'whiteboard'. Also for the text it can have a filter such as monitoring cuss and racial words.
Adobe Flash Player is needed. Now it is just up to the Moderators and such
We are thinking along the same lines. A private collaboration room. But it may be a paid feature. Maybe a part of being a subscriber. Tell me what you would want in it.
I love open study 2 because it's like a free tutor that helps :)
You could use a system called Adobe Connect! But I feel like by making it a paid feature, it would ruin it's purpose really... But it would entice more people to pay :/
I agree @Preetha , possibly it could be a paid feature. I know some people will not be too happy about it being a paid feature, however in the future I can see me becomign a subscriber to this website.
Yea the current "Subscribe" features aren't that intriguing :P If you add more to it you have a guaranteed subscriber right here...
Although, I do believe it should be used for the help of education and not a paid feature. But it's whatever the OpenStudy developers and people want I guess :).
one problem i can think of it can be easily used for cheating on a test. if both/all users are in for it. it would be difficult to moderate instantly, and possibly they have exchanged the answers already. defeats the purpose of learning....
I don't follow :P ^^
I do see that happening, or a portfolio or project being given or something. Just like that, it could happen. Many people just ask for the answers, and then people want them in return. I do see what Hartnn is saying
A needs an answer to a test, B has no problem giving it. they join this collaboration. no learning happens.
A gets a great grade, so B asks if they want more. A gets all these answers, without learning a single thing, B then might want some answers in return.
Okay I get it, the only thing I can think of to avoid something like this is maybe having a limit on how many collabs. are active at the same time maybe :P And then a moderator can watch over 10 different collabs or something :P If it's only for subscribed members I'm sure that should work. Sorry it might sound stupid or too much lol
If a moderator HAD to monitor the collabs, it would make sense that they take different shifts or something, and then watch over a few. But, I don't know about taking shifts because such things could come up preventing a moderator from being able to look out after the collabs. You could have like 20 collab rooms, but still, it is a lot to handle, and monitoring the actual chat as it is can be a bit rough. Trying to make everything inline I could tell is harder than just sitting there answering questions or asking them
Yea so far every idea that's been thrown out here has given rise to a newer problem with new ideas with even more problems. Sounds like real-world politics...
Well, at least we don't shutdown for disagreeing... XD But they do have to take precautions before just adding something in, because if they did, us members would have problems with other people, and it would be harder for the Mods and Ambies. And, the people that add this stuff in probably don't want to add something in just to do it, and then have it backfire on everyone
HA! ^ :D But I see your point. Well I hope they come up with something, the websites good and all but there's always room for improvement :P
Agreed with you @hartnn ,@Dragan96 and kfins99. All great ideas to support this. Thanks :D. Also, I do believe that maybe a 'recording' or something can be made if moderators and/or ambies and so they can view the entire session. Either that or you can assign a new rank as "Collaboration Moderator" or something along those lines and give it to people who you think deserve it, then they can access a control panel for the collaboration to moderate all or even one collaboration session. It is up to the developers though, however I am hoping they will look into putting this on OpenStudy, as I think it would be a widely used feature.
It's a good idea. However, I think there should be some lines set. 1. You need to be a subscriber 2. A subscriber can invite an un-subscriber or another subscriber - however, the subscriber MUST be the host if he is to invite an un-subscriber. 3. Private sessions can be viewed by administrators and moderators 4. Private sessions must be approved by a moderator - an email gets sent to them, and it will be pending until approved. This way, moderators know who is and who isn't a private session, and can moderate them easily.
:)(:
Can you design this for me? I appoint everyone in this question as the Private Study group task force. Hartn and compassionate, as the mod and ambi, if you can report back to me that would be great. email. Thanks
So you mean everyone who replied design this?
Administrator: @Preetha Ambassador: @Compassionate Moderator: @hartnn Team: @Kfins99 , @skiller8860 , @csimmons01, @Dragan96 , @amy143 , @Sylena_Nicole
If you would like to substitute or dropout - let me know before we begin designing.
I'm in (:
Sounds good :)
Wait a 12-24 hour period for everyone to check in, and if they don't they aren't in the team? Do you think that is a good idea? @Compassionate
I like compassionate's ideas except the fourth point. I don't think any mod is waiting for hundreds of emails for private session requests a day. But I would set a smartscore limit so you have to be at least smartscore 50+ and subscriber.
That sounds like a better idea. Also, instead of an email, there could be a request entry thing, and you can see the members from the outside before joining the room. So like, you decide to join a room with 4 people, 1 is an administrator of the room and the other three are members receiving help. You can request to join, and the admin can leave it closed (no one can join), request only, or open (anyone can join at any time). And, when the host of the group wants to stop giving help, they can close the room, or give authority to another host/hostess that they feel comfortable with
I think cheating is still a problem, as we don't have many active moderators and it would be difficult to moderate multiple rooms at once. It's a good idea, but it has its flaws. This could be used for tutoring as well. For example, people in another color are the tutors, and people who gather in a room need study a certain topic they have trouble with, mainly math.
It has its benefits, but also its flaws which may lead to the removal of this due to cheating and usage of profane language or illustrations.
Of course there will be flaws in everything. But you can censor the language, and someone can host a room, that way, they can remove a person who abuses the ability to chat that way
What if the host abuses his whiteboard abilities?
his/her*
I will check back in this group tomorrow - 'll make a separate post so we can discuss this in a new topic. @thomaster , instead of a single email, Preetha could incorporate a community account, through Openstudy, e.g, privaterequest@openstudy.com. A Smartscore doesn't seem fair - if it's a subscriber option, then anyone should be able, as long as they're subscribed, to be able to start a private session. There does, however, have to be some way that moderators can view who is and isn't in a private session. Maybe a log of some sort?
when you pay for something, you are less likely to abuse it.
Moderators can get a small notification for when a group is started, and take turns in moderating.
He/she will most likely be banned from ever hosting again. Also, I am not even sure if there will be a host. But I am very sure it is going to be enable to OpenStudy
There is still the chance though thomaster.
Yes and no Chib, it may happen, but it will be very rare occasions, maybe even at all.
We can trust that the subscribers will not abuse their power and are responsible, so it won't be too much of a worry. I mean, people who come here to troll are probably not going to pay to troll even more, they do it enough for free.
Exactly (: And, by paying for it, they would lose the privilege, and then regret paying for it in the first place. So, I really don't think it will be abused, only to the people that truly are trying to learn, and not just get the answers.
If they subscribe, they can pay a little less for the loss of the group power due to their past warnings and bans.
Now that I think about it, this collaboration group can be an extra dd-in that can be payed for.
Like, you subscribe and you pay a small amount, and you have the option to pay more for certain extra features.
add-in*
Well, I think that will come. But I don't think they should pay less for their fault. If they want to try and get the other privileges, they should pay the same price, but not get the one they abused because, well, they broke that rule.
Yeah, that sounds better :I
I think I'll continue this discussion tomorrow, it's getting late. Once this question starts to lag we can discuss elsewhere.
Compasoniate and Preetha, I'm in to help assist this and design.
im totally in.... that would be sweet!!!
@hartnn My idea for this was to make it public viewable, but only invitees could reply. This would make it still able to be held accountable for test violations and keep with the "Open" aspects of OpenStudy, but make it so that if a tutoring session is going on there will not be a bunch of people adding in this, that, and the other.
Like a K12 Blackboard type of thing?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!