CAN SOMEONE MAKE THIS SOUND BETTER? Since the start of the CSI television shows, science has always been a factor that always came last. The CSI shows that science is the best way to figure out evidence and solve the case. [But the programs also foster what analysts say is the mistaken notion that criminal science is fast and infallible and always gets its man. That's affecting the way lawyers prepare their cases, as well as the expectations that police and the public place on real crime labs. Real crime-scene investigators say that because of the programs, people often have unrealistic ideas

Question

CAN SOMEONE MAKE THIS SOUND BETTER?  Since the start of the CSI television shows, science has always been a factor that always came last. The CSI shows that science is the best way to figure out evidence and solve the case. [But the programs also foster what analysts say is the mistaken notion that criminal science is fast and infallible and always gets its man. That's affecting the way lawyers prepare their cases, as well as the expectations that police and the public place on real crime labs. Real crime-scene investigators say that because of the programs, people often have unrealistic ideas

anonymous · Answer

of what criminal science can deliver.] In paragraph, Willings states that since the CSI shows been brought to us,

anonymous · Answer

Since the beginning of the CSI television shows, the last factor considered has always been science. The CSI is adamant that science is the best way to figure out evidence and solve the case. But the television programs create illusion that criminal science is fast and infallible and always gets its man. This affects the way lawyers prepare their cases, as well as the expectations that police and the public place on real crime labs. Real crime scene investigators say the delusive programs give people unrealistic ideas of the  real CSI.