Question

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How did the national government under the Constitution differ from the government under the Articles of Confederatio?

Answer 1

are you even there

Answer 2

i could just delete the answer

Answer 3

@tvartheman Close it... you are SPAMMING. I will report you. close your POSTS^

Answer 4

How am I spamming?? I simply asked a question?

Answer 5

you weren't even paying any attention too it

Answer 6

Becasue I am not going to sit here for 15 mins and wait for someone to answer it. I was doing other school work..

Answer 7

i was puting my answer for it and it took my 3 mins to type it but i wasted 3 minuts of mylif to help someone tht does not want it

Answer 8

but as soon as you posted ur question i answered it

Answer 9

@tvartheman I don't uderstand why you're getting defensive. Obviously I did want help because if I didn't I would not have posted my question. Please excuse the fact that I do not have time to sit here and look at this one page until someone answers my question because I have other shool work that needs to be done. It is a waste of time arguing with you, so you can either answer my question, which I am now here to see, or you can move onto another persons question. THANKS!

Answer 10

ok

Answer 11

STOP it @tvartheman

Answer 12

Can someone please just answer my question?

Answer 13

The Articles of Confederation was America's first form of government. The Constitution came afterwards as a result of the problems of the Articles. The articles were weak because they gave most of the power to the states and very little to the Federal government. Because of this the United States were basically a loose alliance of the states. The Constitution gave more power to the Federal government and is the oldest written government still in use.

Answer 14

The Articles of Confederation were the founding fathers first attempt at a plan of government. They gave much more power to the states than to the U.S. government. Under them, the U.S govt couldn't regulate commerce (trade) and couldn't tax the states. Basically they couldn't do anything. The U.S. govt could make decisions, but had no power to enforce their decisions or make the states do anything. Shay's rebellion, where a bunch of poor farmers revolted because of debts, kind of showed how ineffective the A of C were, since there was really no national army to handle the rebellion.

The Constitution was attempt #2. It created a method of sharing power between the states and national govt called federalism, which is a huge topic unto itself. To cliff-notes it, theoretically the power is divided equally between state and national govt. Of course, the Constitution is HUGE and has a ton of stuff in it, but that's the main compare/contrast between the two

Answer 15

is tht good enough

Answer 16

;]