Ask
your own question, for FREE!
OCW Scholar - Multivariable Calculus
13 Online
I completely understand the prof's explanation about the Lagrangian with one constraint - but I don't understand why the two constraint formulation works: i.e. L = f(x, y, z) + lambda1 g(x, y, z) + lambda2 h(x, y, z) = 0 Here f is the min/max function, and g and h are the two constraints. If there was no h, then the prof's explanation in lecture 39 makes completely sense in "matching up" the gradients of f and g with lambda1 as the scaler (where f = - lambda1 x g). But, I don't understand how the second constraint can simply be "added" to the Lagrangian equation. Thank you!
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
heartlessprophet:
How do i get paid from work when im in job court ?
Aubree:
Guys, what does love feel like? I've been getting a tight chest and when I talk to him my heart rate hangs out around 100-120 beats per min, and when he doe
thereneelg:
ok... anyone have advice?? ...I did Choir all throughout Middle school and have ALWAYS been put in Soprano those three years.
kamariana:
The Byzantine Procopius is known for (5 points) reconquering much of the old Roma
chuckD:
hellp!!! what does it mean to describe a scientist as skeptical Why is sceptical
DoltonCarlee:
So like do y'all know anything about the first world war?
thehearken:
anyone know how to explain this so its easier for me to understand? b(1)=2, b(n)=
19 hours ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
22 hours ago
8 Replies
1 Medal
1 day ago
6 Replies
1 Medal
2 days ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
2 days ago
2 Replies
1 Medal
1 day ago
2 Replies
0 Medals
2 days ago
5 Replies
2 Medals