Ask
your own question, for FREE!
OCW Scholar - Multivariable Calculus
14 Online
I completely understand the prof's explanation about the Lagrangian with one constraint - but I don't understand why the two constraint formulation works: i.e. L = f(x, y, z) + lambda1 g(x, y, z) + lambda2 h(x, y, z) = 0 Here f is the min/max function, and g and h are the two constraints. If there was no h, then the prof's explanation in lecture 39 makes completely sense in "matching up" the gradients of f and g with lambda1 as the scaler (where f = - lambda1 x g). But, I don't understand how the second constraint can simply be "added" to the Lagrangian equation. Thank you!
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
DoltonCarlee:
what are y'all's options on S A T essays because honestly their not that bad
thereneelg:
Can someone give me a summary of article 231, The war guilt clause?? I need to explain what it is, but I can't find any shortened version of what it is and
luisaam2:
What should you do when the person you want to talk to the most is the one making
Breathless:
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/nAYivIl6oXB6q9QAI?invite=cr-MSxCSk4sMTY4OTA4N
Twaylor:
I'm not that good at law can someone fact check this without bias? June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Chatrie v.
Demon25:
For a hoco proposal with a cheerleader and football player, what else should be a
22 hours ago
4 Replies
2 Medals
2 days ago
7 Replies
1 Medal
1 day ago
16 Replies
1 Medal
1 week ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
1 week ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
1 week ago
12 Replies
0 Medals