Question

I get so confused with these questions
The following argument is valid:
All turtles are green
All people are green
Therefore all turtles are people

Answer 1

that would be a logic question

it depends on what you are doing, what are you confused about?

Answer 2

Figuring out if these are valid or invalid. Suppose to be using Euler

Answer 3

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Answer 4

I'm thinking this one is True it is a valid argument

Answer 5

No. Turtles are not people. Merely: both are green.

Answer 6

Im pretty sure this would be inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning would be more like

All men are mortal
I am a man
I am mortal.

This is because i am a part of the group of man.

Inductive is when it is not nessasarally part of the group, like your green turtlepeople

Answer 7

necessarily

Answer 8

you can tell because it is false because turtles are not in the people group.

All people are green
I am a person
I am green

Answer 9

All A are B
C is A
Thus, C is B also

Answer 10

That's a syllogism, deductive.

Inductive would be to examine lots of cases and conclude something about the next one.

Answer 11

The book gave a terrible explanation. They was I understood with the circles they had as examples was they keyword "all" was a circle within a circle, which usually is valid.