Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

From a boat on the lake, the angle of elevation to the top of a cliff is 26°1'. If the base of the cliff is 205 feet from the boat, how high is the cliff (to the nearest foot)?

OpenStudy (wolf1728):

26° 1' = 26.0166666667° tan (26.0166666) = opposite (or height) / 205 opposite (or height) = 205 * tan (26.0166666) height = 205 * 1.2193797869 height = 249.97285632 feet = 250 feet (rounded)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

These were my choices @wolf1728 : A) 113 ft B) 110 ft C) 103 ft D) 100 ft

OpenStudy (wolf1728):

Oh I just discovered my mistake. I obtained the tangent value from an Excel / Open Office spreadsheet and I forgot that the default value is radians NOT degrees - ARRGGHH !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yes, radians are a convenient, natural unit of measure when dealing with calculus and sciences. HOWEVER, when someone is dealing with common, ordinary reality, having radians as a default value is an incredibly STUPID thing. So the new equation becomes height = 205 * 0.4880927253 height = 100.0590086787 height = 100 feet or D I find it unsettling that my carpenter's square is uselessly calibrated in degrees as opposed to the easier to use radians. I mean doesn't everyone like to check their do it yourself weekend construction projects by making sure each corner of a room measures exactly 1.5707963268 radians? Oh and once again, the height of that cliff is 100 feet. I'm hoping I used the correct unit instead of the much more logical furlongs or cubits. and don't forget 100 feet = 9.8779 x 10-22 Megaparsecs

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!