Which statement is true?
All rectangles are quadrilaterals. All quadrilaterals are rectangles. All quadrilaterals are parallelograms. All quadrilaterals are shares.
All rectangles are quadrilaterals.
Can you help on another..
There's no rectangle that is less/more than 4 sides. Hence, they are all and always quadrilaterals. Sure, I can.
ohh okay A square is (blank) a rectangle Always sometimes never inconclusive (Not enough info)
always
I was kinda thinking never also
Why is it always
You both are wrong.
wait why though do you have an explanation….
Okay. A square must have 4 equal sides. A rectangle has to have four sides, sides parallel from each other must be the same length, which a square exhibits that property. A rectangle must have 90 degree interior angles, which a square does have.
Aside from that, you have told that. Properties of rectangles are: Opposite sides are parallel and congruent The diagonals bisect each other The diagonals are congruent Square also does have all of these properties.
However a square is a rhombus and a rectangle is not
@annas, though square has all four sides parallel and congruent, still, the two pairs of sides of square are parallel and congruent, right? @Camibayybee Yes, square is a rhombus since it has 4 equal sides and for equal interior angles. But a rhombus will never be a square since rhombus has oblique angles.
Can you prove?
Lol. That is not true. Square is always a rectangle.
@hartnn , what can you say about this. this hh person don't believe me. >,<
Guys its okay
Just leave it I closed the question
properties of a quadrilateral are subset of properties of a rectangle, thats why we say all rectangles are quadrilateral. in same way, properties of rectangle are subset of properties of square, so we must conclude, all squares are rectangle :)
its like saying all squares are always rectangles with some more properties.
Then why don't they just call a square a rectangle is its basically the same thing
because of those "extra" properties that square has, its unique. and must be called as square only
Exactly
So therefore A square is not a rectangle
Farewelll
we are NOT discussing what a square can be "called" we are discussing whether a square has ALL THE PROPERTIES of rectangle or not?? if it has all properties, we can safely conclude that all squares behave like rectangles too
Then why was your friend saying A square is always a rectangle?
If it is only a rectangle sometimes?
But why not
if it does have all the properties of a square???
correction, a rectangle will be a square if its a rhombus too, like when all sides of rectangle are equal. So a rectangle is SOMETIMES a square, but a square is always a rectangle.
No no no
A rect does NOT have all properties of square. so its sometimes square (when all sides equal) A square always has all properties of rect. so its always a rect
But a square has sides that are equal
unlike a rectangle
that makes rectangle NOT square. that doesn't make square NOT rectangle. still that square has all properties of rect.
"a square has sides that are equal" which makes some rectangles as NOT squares.
That doesn't make sense!!!!!!!
A square is not a rectangle
As I said If a square was a rectangle then it should be called a rectangle
sorry if i am confusing you. take a square , any square, ask it whether its a rectangle or not. it will check its properties, if it has all properties of rect, then it will reply yes, i am rect.
and if there is even 1 property of rectangle that the square does not possess, then it will reply no, i am not rect.
The square said it is not a rectangle
o your completely wrong
then ask that square which property a rectangle has and you don't have ?
Is a square a rhombus?
are you human? always, sometimes, never.
are all humans Camibayybee ?
Yes it is
Is a rectangle a rhombus?
No
ofcourse, a square is rhombus too
a rectangle is sometimes rhombus only when all sides of rect are equal
But thats not a rectangle thats a square
and only in those cases, that rect will be a square too
thats why we say rect is SOMETIMES SQUARE
a rectangle cannot be a rhombus A square can It is either one or the other
a rect can NEVER be rhombus <<<<<FALSE a rect can be sometimes rhombus
A square has equal sides a rect only has 2 sides equal
correct. that square still have 2 equal sides, so its still a rect
but where are the other sides that are different length
o thats cause its a square
can you give me example of one square which is NOT a rectangle ?
we know, let her think
A square
similar example, are you human ?? you will check whether you have all properties of human, if yes, you'll say , yes i am human
are all humans Camibayybee ? humans will check when can they not be Camibayybee, they will reply, we are sometimes Camibayybee , because there are many humans not Camibayybee.
clear any doubt which you still have in mind. :)
Acctually you are wrong
As you can see here
2300 years ago a square was NEVER a rectangle (oblong)
that didn't say, a square is not oblong.
??
that paper just listed the properties. it never explicitly mentions whether a square is an oblong or not
And a square isn't actually "a special kind of rectangle"
because as you can see a square has 90degree angles and a rhombus does not
a square IS a special kind of rect. with the speciality of all sides being equal
Omgggg But look understand that a rectangle doesn't have equal sides
A square was made just to be a square
yes, a rect. does not have equal sides. but a square has all properties of a rect., so its a rect.
That is why they made a square and a rectangle and you cannot say a square is a special kind waterer because it was never a rhombus in the first place
do you see where I'm coming from
A square is only a square a rhombus is only a rhombus a rectangle is only a rectangle
why to bring rhombus in the discussion ?
its like saying humans are only humans and Camibayybee can never be human :(
Because you are saying a a square is a special kind of shape
a rhombus is sometimes a square. a square is always a rhombus.
NOOOOOOO
Because a rhombus does NOT have 90 degree angles
so how is it a rhombus?
a rhombus is sometimes a square.(when it has all angles = 90) a square is always a rhombus.(because it has all properties of rhombus)
Youu see what I'm saying look, Lisennnn READ
i am sorry if i irritate you, i am reading all your replies curiously. "Because a rhombus does NOT have 90 degree angles" that is why some rhombus cannot be square, but that does not mean a square cannot be rhombus. you're stil not following my rule, if x has all properties of y, then x is y.
if you have all properties of human, then you are human.
A square is not a special shape because it is not a rhombus yes many is has equal sides like a rhombus but the angles are not 90 degrees therefore a rhombus is a rhombus itself it is its own shape. Now listen a square is not a rectangle because The sides differ. take away the theory of a square being a rhombus. Now you are left with a square and a rectangle. Now a square does have 90 degree sides like a rectangle it is a 4 sided shape (like a rhombus) BUT its sides differ a square has equal sides but a rectangle has only 2 equal sides. So a square is NOT a rectangle because of that fact itself Do you understand
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!