Question

Please help! Which best describes a consequence of Tolkien's decision to set The Hobbit in Middle-earth rather than a real place?



A.
The setting allowed him to give his novel a happy ending rather than a tragic one.


B.
The setting allowed him to write about a heroic figure who goes on a quest.


C.


The setting allowed him to invent all different kinds of imaginary creatures, myths, and gods.


D.
The setting allowed him to write about characters who had flaws and did not always do the right thing.

Answer 1

@miypow do you know the answer?

Answer 2

no i have never read this book before

Answer 3

sorry

Answer 4

k do you know anyone to tag that might? @miypow

Answer 5

C

Answer 6

no, sorry but i think you have an answer already ^

Answer 7

Use process of Elimination. The Hobbit is a movie right?

Answer 8

yes and a book @BlueDigitalCamo[SFH2]

Answer 9

The Hobbit is a series so it can't be A because the series hasn't ended yet!
It could be B but you don't need a real place to have heroic figure you can have a heroic figure in either science fiction middle earth or "real place".

C seems to make the most sense because in a "real place" you can invent myths, creatures etc because obviously you are not going to have orcs in say London. If you create your own area, the possibility of what you do there are endless because you have no limit in what you can imagine.

Answer 10

Mistake you CAN"T invent myths creatures etc.

Answer 11

so then what is it? also the book is all 3 movies in 1 @BlueDigitalCamo[SFH2]

Answer 12

Oh book. Well I have never read the books..

Answer 13

I would still say C, this however would be better answered by someone who has read the books thoroughly but C just makes the most sense here.

Answer 14

i think its c

Answer 15

k thanks @sierraleone17 and @BlueDigitalCamo[SFH2]

Answer 16

Go with C.

Answer 17

Np

Answer 18

C is correct I've read the book, I hope I've helped

Answer 19

the answer is C . I guarantee it.