Given ΔLMN where the length of segment NP is greater than the length of segment LP, the following is an indirect paragraph proof proving segment MP is not a median:

Question

anonymous · Answer

Assume segment MP is a median. According to the definition of a median, point P is the midpoint of side L N. By the definition of a midpoint NP = LP. This contradicts the given statement. Therefore, segment MP is not a median.

Is the indirect proof logically valid? If so, why? If not, why not?

anonymous · Answer

Yes. Statements are presented in a logical order using the correct theorems.

 Yes. The conclusion was used to contradict the assumption.

 No. The conclusion was used to contradict the assumption.

 No. The progression of the statements is logically inaccurate.

anonymous · Answer

@adrynicoleb @binks @beachdays323 @Goblin99 @hartnn @TashaMeni7 @WeeCAT64 @Goblin99 @kturpy @kx2bay

anonymous · Answer

@bowershe @MakeAWish

anonymous · Answer

@DR62 @TashaMeni7 @taylorlee @Tabbiejack @redreversed @YanaSidlinskiy

anonymous · Answer

Really need help please

yanasidlinskiy · Answer

I'm not sure how to do this...sorry...:(

anonymous · Answer

@ParthKohli @Quesadiella @WoWgirl96 @@Nurali

anonymous · Answer

@Nurali

anonymous · Answer

It's logically invalid since the third statement does not contradict the second one. The fourth statement "This contradicts the given statement." is incorrect.