Which statement explains why the American public reacted differently to the formation of the United Nations than it had to the formation of League of Nations?
The end of World War II did not result in the same isolationism in the United States that had resulted after World War I.
The United Nations was supported by all of the Allies, whereas the League of Nations had been opposed by most of the Allies.
The American public was more concerned about communism after World War II than it had been after World War I.
The United States was not expected to contribute as much money to the United

Question

Which statement explains why the American public reacted differently to the formation of the United Nations than it had to the formation of League of Nations?
 The end of World War II did not result in the same isolationism in the United States that had resulted after World War I.
 The United Nations was supported by all of the Allies, whereas the League of Nations had been opposed by most of the Allies.
 The American public was more concerned about communism after World War II than it had been after World War I.
 The United States was not expected to contribute as much money to the United

anonymous · Answer

@ManImStumped ? Do you know this?

anonymous · Answer

I'm thinking C...

paki · Answer

i will go for " The United Nations was supported by all of the Allies, whereas the League of Nations had been opposed by most of the Allies"...

anonymous · Answer

Paki is right.

anonymous · Answer

Why was the L of N opposed by most Allies?

paki · Answer

just have a look at the history of war-2, you will know all...

anonymous · Answer

It's actually A guys... League of Nations was supported by most allies, communism doesn't really factor in it, since it's about wars, and they were still expected to contribute. They did not enjoy the same isolationism after WWI because they'd been attacked, so joining was a smart move.