Question

Which best describes the way photographs are considered by historians?

A. primary source documents that are useful in the study of history

B. reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source

C.secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history

D. unreliable sources for the study of history because they are too subjective

E. useful sources for the study of personal histories, but not for general history

Answer 1

>>> @GoldenEagle @Jumperman @11adrian77 @DoomKnight9867 <<<

Answer 2

I think B.

Answer 3

Primary source

Answer 4

PRIMARY SOURCE O-O

Answer 5

It's either A or B

Answer 6

PRIMARY SOURCE

Answer 7

A primary source is a document or physical object which was written or created during the time under study. These sources were present during an experience or time period and offer an inside view of a particular event.

Secondary sources are documents written after an event has occurred, providing secondhand accounts of that event, person, or topic. Unlike primary sources, which provide first-hand accounts, secondary sources offer different perspectives, analysis, and conclusions of those accounts.
So the answer is A

I hope you understand it now cx

Answer 8

It is A

Answer 9

primary source