The Earths' ozone layer, which absorbs the sun's harmful ultraviolet radiation, can be damaged by human activity. Since ozone was first measured in the late 1800's, scientists have attempted to construct scientific models of ozone depletion to better understand and educate about the sensitive ozone layer.

Which is true of the scientific models that they constructed?

Question

The Earths' ozone layer, which absorbs the sun's harmful ultraviolet radiation, can be damaged by human activity. Since ozone was first measured in the late 1800's, scientists have attempted to construct scientific models of ozone depletion to better understand and educate about the sensitive ozone layer.

Which is true of the scientific models that they constructed?

superhelp101 · Answer

A. The models are a simplified version of the real phenomena.
B.The models show all the complexity of the chemical interactions.
C.The models are based on philosophical debate rather than scientific data.
D.The models are an exact three-dimensional demonstration of the interactions.

superhelp101 · Answer

@@Destinymasha @mathwizkevin18 @Cubi-Cal  @biophil @Book_Nerd_101

superhelp101 · Answer

@Destinymasha @dan815 @DavidUsa @deshawn1

superhelp101 · Answer

I think it is B what about you?

anonymous · Answer

If I had to answer, I would say A. Models of natural phenomena are going to be a simplification of what would be found in nature.

As far as B goes, when constructing an actual model, it would be next to impossible to demonstrate "all the complexity" of the chemical processes going on in the actual ozone. 

I'm not a chemistry person, but that would be my answer.

superhelp101 · Answer

hmm... very true! I will think about it thanks! Can you please help me will another question?