You suspect that the spiciness of food served in a restaurant is positively correlated with number of soft drinks ordered. You have gathered several observations of people ordering food of different spice-levels and the number of soft drinks they ordered. What would be your next steps to test your hypothesis?
Plot all data together on a dot plot to assess if there is any visible correlation between the data sets. Offer a conclusion based on the data you observed. Pick two points on the dot plot and find a line of best fit. Find the correlation coefficient to see how well the line of best fit actually fits the data.
Theyre like A B C D
Looks like you can eliminate the options that require you to have already plotted the data. Which options remain?
remove A because we have no data
remove D its irrevevant
remove C theres no point in doing it
Im left with B is B the answer?
Well you do have the data, the reason being that the question states: "You have gathered several observations of people ordering food of different spice-levels and the number of soft drinks they ordered." Therefore you have not found a reason for removing A. C and D can be removed, the reason being they cannot be performed unless the data has been plotted.
So we are left with a choice of A or B. Can you come to a conclusion easily without plotting the data?
Oh yeah... sorry i didnt notice that its A because you have data thats not listed
You are correct, A is the correct choice.
Thanks can you help on antoher one?
Sorry, not right now. I must have a meal. Please post as anew question.
Alrighty o'
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!