Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 19 Online
OpenStudy (loser66):

If 0

OpenStudy (loser66):

a<b and c>0 then ac < bc ac < bd + bc -bd ac < bd - b(d-c) however, c<d , then d - c >0--> b(d-c) >0 so that bd -b (d-c) < bd therefore ac < bd Is there any mistake?

OpenStudy (loser66):

@phi

OpenStudy (loser66):

Is there any other way?

OpenStudy (phi):

the logic looks ok to me. There are probably other ways, but off-hand I don't know them.

OpenStudy (loser66):

Thank you. :)

OpenStudy (phi):

how about 0<a<b 0 < ac < bc for c>0 0<c<d 0 < bc < bd for b >0 so ac < bc and bc < bd ac < bd

OpenStudy (loser66):

Yes, it is ok, also. :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!