Question

Which statement BEST describes John Locke’s argument against the “divine right of kings” theory of government?

A. Kings cannot have divine right because they are not officially part of the church.
B. There is no scientific evidence supporting the existence of a divine right of kings.
C. Divine right can only be claimed by those who afford basic rights to the people they rule.
D. While kings have a divine right to rule, they are responsible for providing basic rights to their subjects.

Answer 1

@Samus_Aran

Answer 2

@sarah786

Answer 3

I found this on internet . dun know personally about it ^_^
Locke considered the concept of the “divine right of kings” what it was, merely a convenient excuse to rule, and a tool to control the masses. B is the correct option

Answer 4

yup I got the same thing, B