Which is the correct way to rewrite the following sentence? Patrick did not eat nothing for lunch.
Patrick never ate nothing for lunch. Patrick ate nothing for lunch. Patrick ate everything for lunch. Patrick ate something for lunch.
Any ideas?
Patrick 'did not' 'ate nothing' for lunch. V V {didn't} {eat nothing}
What can that mean if he didn't eat nothing for lunch?
If he didn't eat nothing, that means he ate...what?
Do you understand? @beacon239
nothing, no
No. If he ate nothing the sentence would say 'Patrick ate nothing for lunch.'
But the sentence says he DIDN'T EAT Nothing.
Do you understand?
So if the sentence says he didn't eat nothing that means the answer can't be that he ate nothing.
So if he didn't eat nothing, does that mean he could've still eaten anything?
@beacon239
It seems you are confused because it would be the answer you chose if you got rid of 'did not' in the sentence.
The opposite of didn't is did. The opposite of nothing is....??? @beacon239
something?
Yes!
I get it now, Thanks a lot !
You're welcome. :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!