1. Discuss how Jonathan Edwards's argument for joining his church in "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" may be considered both a cause and effect appeal and an either/or fallacy. Do you think he intended his argument to be a logical, fact-based argument, or do you think he intended to distract or confuse his audience? Why?

Question

1.	Discuss how Jonathan Edwards's argument for joining his church in "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" may be considered both a cause and effect appeal and an either/or fallacy. Do you think he intended his argument to be a logical, fact-based argument, or do you think he intended to distract or confuse his audience? Why?

anonymous · Answer

here is the story. http://contentlaunch.ple.platoweb.com/content/edl/americanlit2012/assets/AMLIT_L04_Readings.html#bookmark0

anonymous · Answer

@e.mccormick

anonymous · Answer

@confluxepic can you help me

e.mccormick · Answer

Well, what did you think and why?

anonymous · Answer

Well i kind of can't get the concept of the story it I'm confused.

anonymous · Answer

@confluxepic

e.mccormick · Answer

The concept, in short, is go to my church or go to hell.  But does he support it with logic, emotion, or authority?