Would Antibiotics be effective against Viruses? I believe they would not be, is that correct?
@PRAETORIAN.10 @perl ,may I have a tiny bit of your time please? I'm sorry to bother you ;-;
well creating a vaccine is always the good way to go :)
good question :)
viruses can never be defeated by anything
viruses are not living, they need a host
So wait, are antibiotics the same as vaccines?
brb
Antibiotics work against bacteria. Bacteria cause an infection which antibiotics can attack and clear up
And I thought Viruses were living because while a virus cannot reproduce by itsself, it must infect and use another living cell to reproduce
Or am I confusing myself
vaccines are used to prevent disease, antibiotics are used to treat diseases that have already occurred. In addition, antibiotics do not work on viruses or viral illnesses such as common cold or flu.
dont overcomplicate things kiddo
So wait.. Viruses and Bacteria are the same thing? I thought they were to totally separate things for a moment.
Viruses lack the properties of living things: They have no energy metabolism, they do not grow, they produce no waste products, and they do not respond to stimuli. They also don't reproduce independently but must replicate by invading living cells
So to clarify, Viruses are NOT living, and antibiotics have no effect on them?
But Vaccines do?
Unless Vaccines and Antibiotics are the same thing
Oh my goodness I'm confusing myself.
difference between bacteria and virus http://www.diffen.com/difference/Bacteria_vs_Virus
Bacteria are single-celled, prokaryotic microorganisms that exist in abundance in both living hosts and in all areas of the planet (e.g., soil, water). By their nature, they can be either "good" (beneficial) or "bad" (harmful) for the health of plants, humans and other animals that come into contact with them. A virus is acellular (has no cell structure) and requires a living host to survive; it causes illness its host, which then elicits immune responses. Bacteria are alive, while scientists are not yet sure if viruses are living or non-living.
bacteria has a flagellum,which is a little tail. and they can move
Oh I see! SO Vaccines and Antibiotics can help prevent viruses right?
i should say, certain bacteria have a flagellum, a whip like tail, that serves to help them move
antibiotics treat bacteria anti-bio (against life ) vaccines are used to prevent viruses , which are given to young children so they develop immunity
So back to the original question - Antibiotics do not help prevent viruses?
Because A Vaccine is a pathogen right?
vaccines are prevention measures , to prevent future viruses. vaccines do not treat an active bacterial infection
antibiotics treat bacterial infection (bad bacteria)
OHHH Okay I understand!
not all bacteria is bad, you have bacteria that aids digestion in the gut
yay
I understand! Thank you for your very appreciated help! I'm making myself a study guide for my exam on Thursday and I'm studying my butt off.
I appreciate both of your help so much!
the other guy did most of the work
i mainly chatted about squid in the chat box
lol
perfect for the occasion right?
yep :)
i'm kinda a big deal
it k its funny :')
Prae I like your new profile pic btw ^-^
lol thanks, it was before i got my hair cut. finally. back to my military buzzcut
lol i didnt know what face to pull so i shrugged like a baws xD
which is what i will do in the exam when i am stuck on a question
#sadly so relatable
Simple explanation to the question at top. As perl mentioned that viruses are non living outside the host cell. This is because they don't have their own cellular mechanism and rather use host's cell. Now suppose if you administer an antibiotic against these viruses, you are actually targetting the host cell ! So that's the reason why antibiotics are useless against viruses.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!