The figure below shows a transversal t which intersects the parallel lines PQ and RS: Write a paragraph to prove that the measure of angle 3 is equal to the measure of angle 5.
@Directrix
Do you already know the Corresponding Angles Postulate? This is a proof of the Alternate Interior Angle Theorem?
Look in the text and see which type of angles associated with parallel lines cut by a transversal were taken to be congruent by a postulate. Without that, this proof can't be done.
I don't understand...
Look, this person had the same question. http://openstudy.com/updates/4ffc22b8e4b00c7a70c4d185
Look in the back of your Geometry book and find the list of postulates. Look for one about corresponding angles of parallel lines. Differnt books use different kinds of angles for the postulate. We need to know what your class did.
I'm on it...
I can't find it :/
Look in the book at the beginning of the chapter or section on parallel lines. It may be there.
@ZnappyDooZ
Alright, though, what should I write for the answer?
@Directrix
Hey, you wanna leave this of for last? I got a few more that might be easier :P
The paragraph proof is what I posted assuming that your text takes corresponding angles as a postulate.
Oh i see, so you think I should write what you wrote above?
You could write something like that.
Is this good?
When the lines PQ and RS are cut by the transversal t. the < 3 ≅ < 7 by the Corresponding Angles Postulate. <7 ≅ <5 because vertical angles are congruent. Therefore, <3≅<5 by the Transitive Property of Congruence. By definition of congruent angles, m<3 = m<5.
That sounds good.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!