Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 19 Online
OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

Many people dont agree but..

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

Many people dont agree that iit doesnt matter form which poin to subtarct when usng slope formula li (x1, y1) (x2, y2) they dont agree that (y1-y2)/(x1-x2)=(y2-1)/(x2-x1) it amtter to subtract from same pooint

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You can use any 2 points you want to use the slope formula

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

i always tell them it doesnt matter they are taught that it matters but it is wrong. there are many wrong materials today and probably hese people were taught by them. But in good books it doesnt matter.

OpenStudy (uri):

I think we are taught : \[m =\frac{ (y2-y1) }{ (x2-x1) }\] at school. :p

OpenStudy (perl):

they are actually equal , I will prove it

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

they are @@Nnesha

OpenStudy (uri):

I'm not Nnesha,lol. @AlexandervonHumboldt2

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

no i tagged nensha

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

to come hre s i always have disputes about itwith her

OpenStudy (uri):

why not just use the formula taught at school rather than getting all confused with cancelling.

OpenStudy (perl):

(y1-y2)/(x1-x2) = ( - ( -y1 + y2) ) / ( - ( -x1 + x2)) = (-( y2 - y1))/(-(x2 - x1) = (-1/-1)* ( y2 - y1) / (x2 -x1) =(y2-1)/(x2-x1)

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

yeah great i know thats and now it is proved

OpenStudy (perl):

either formula is correct, since they are equal (since its a ratio, the order does not count)

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

of course

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

no they jut say it is matter @uri they tell thats using another formula is A WRONG WAY

Nnesha (nnesha):

waooo you should tag me first

OpenStudy (perl):

is slope arbitrarily defined? Can we define it as change in x over change in y?

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

hmm see @Nnesha i was riight?

Nnesha (nnesha):

lol @uri

OpenStudy (perl):

i think we could but it would make calculating more complicated

Nnesha (nnesha):

see what he said

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

hey!!!!

OpenStudy (uri):

Don't make your life so complicated, @AlexandervonHumboldt2 lol

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

ok

Nnesha (nnesha):

i will come back and read this whole essay i gtg now

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

it is better to listen to me than dispute. i say only that is proved i dont tell my maybes

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

bye now

Nnesha (nnesha):

and my name is

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

hmmm

Nnesha (nnesha):

but formula is |dw:1419202842436:dw| yeah like perl said we can take out negative our in other case and that's why its a loooooot work some user already don't want to put effort in so it reallyy toooo much for them to take out negative you can use like you did on last question - 3 - 4 and you did like this ---- > (3+4) did you explain them how its turn to 3+4 so if you use normal formula then we don't have to explain bnch of things

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!