Question

help plzz fan and medal

Answer 1

http://learn.flvs.net/webdav/educator_mjcivics_v13/sharingpower/03_03/03_03_11_a.htm

Answer 2

@jordanloveangel @FireWolfSpirit @Amazingguy00

Answer 3

The system is unable to access the cookie that was assigned to your computer upon login. The most likely cause of this problem is an improper access to the course via a bookmark, browser window that was left open, or an improper exit from the system.

To resolve the problem you will need to:

Log into your course
Delete your browser cookies
Click the "Logoff" button
Reboot your computer
Sign back into your account
Make sure you properly logoff and close your browser window each time you exit the system
If you need assistance resolving this problem please follow the steps below:

Click on the "Technical Support" link within your course.
Click the "Educator Help Desk" sublink, located just below the "Technical Support" button you just clicked.
Select that the "Nature of your problem" is with the "Educator System". This will route the request to our team.
In the problem description field, provide a brief description of the problem you are experiencing. In this case, something along the lines of "When I click on Lessons I get a cookie error" will be more than sufficient.
When you click the "Submit" button this will send your problem description to our team along with your account information and some information about the browser you are using. We will then reset your account as quickly as possible and provide you with the appropriate steps to reset your browser on your computer.

Answer 4

best i can do

Answer 5

Name: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________
Read each pretend case and answer the questions that follow.

Scenario 1

Local law requires that drivers drive no faster than 45 miles per hour on local roads. The law outlines punishments for those who speed. The penalty increases the faster the person travels above the speed limit. The most severe punishments are for those who travel faster than 20 miles per hour above the speed limit.

Signs post this law on most roads, but some sections of roads are missing signs. Local police stop a man traveling 67 miles per hour. He apologizes and insists that he meant no harm. His wife was having a baby and he was anxious to get her quickly to a hospital. The officer gave him a ticket and told him he will have to appear in court since he was going so fast.

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Do you think the new father has a valid argument that he should not have received a ticket? In other words, should government change the law or make an exception? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. ____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Scenario 2

State law recognizes that the owner of a vehicle is the person or company whose name appears on the title, or legal and official ownership document. The state also recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means.

A young woman says her neighbor agreed to purchase her old car. She agreed to accept payments from him on a monthly basis until he paid off the car and trusted that he would honor this plan. She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car.

The neighbor says he understood the car to be a gift and has no obligation to make payments. He did not sign an official agreement to make payments. He says that she gave him the car in exchange for his electric scooter, which is new and gets great gas mileage. The neighbor maintains she just wants the car back now that he fixed it and it looks better.

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. ____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Scenario 3

Federal law requires that news agencies not publish or broadcast information that could threaten the security of the nation's armed forces in times of conflict. However, the Constitution protects the right to free expression of ideas. Judges use past decisions on cases where the law and rights come into conflict to settle similar disputes. In one case, New York Times vs. United States, the Supreme Court decided that a newspaper could publish information about the military that the president said should remain secret to protect the troops. The justices said the president failed to prove that the information could threaten the nation's security.

Federal officials accuse an online newspaper of violating the law against publishing secret information about the military. One of the newspaper's reporters posted comments online about her friend, who is a soldier serving overseas. On her personal website, she posted a picture of him, where he is stationed, and negative opinions of his commanders, including the president. The newspaper insists that the reporter did this on her own time and that the newspaper is not responsible. The reporter maintains that whether at work or not, she has the right to express her opinions freely under the Constitution.

U.S. government officials say that the posting of the information could put the soldier in harm's way. Officials also say that her negative opinions could encourage others to stop supporting the soldiers and break laws in protest. They insist that because a reporter for the newspaper, people could believe that her ideas are those of everyone working for the newspaper. They say the newspaper and the reporter have threatened the safety and security of the armed forces.

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or a combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Do you think the reporter has a valid argument? In other words, should government change the law or make an exception? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. ____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Answer 6

@jordanloveangel

Answer 7

idk sorry man!

Answer 8

its ok

Answer 9

@Compassionate

Answer 10

@iambatman

Answer 11

@IronPatriot

Answer 12

I'm here

Answer 13

still need help?

Answer 14

yes

Answer 15

ok

Answer 16

whats your question?

Answer 17

Name: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________
Read each pretend case and answer the questions that follow.

Scenario 1

Local law requires that drivers drive no faster than 45 miles per hour on local roads. The law outlines punishments for those who speed. The penalty increases the faster the person travels above the speed limit. The most severe punishments are for those who travel faster than 20 miles per hour above the speed limit.

Signs post this law on most roads, but some sections of roads are missing signs. Local police stop a man traveling 67 miles per hour. He apologizes and insists that he meant no harm. His wife was having a baby and he was anxious to get her quickly to a hospital. The officer gave him a ticket and told him he will have to appear in court since he was going so fast.

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Do you think the new father has a valid argument that he should not have received a ticket? In other words, should government change the law or make an exception? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. ____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Scenario 2

State law recognizes that the owner of a vehicle is the person or company whose name appears on the title, or legal and official ownership document. The state also recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means.

A young woman says her neighbor agreed to purchase her old car. She agreed to accept payments from him on a monthly basis until he paid off the car and trusted that he would honor this plan. She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car.

The neighbor says he understood the car to be a gift and has no obligation to make payments. He did not sign an official agreement to make payments. He says that she gave him the car in exchange for his electric scooter, which is new and gets great gas mileage. The neighbor maintains she just wants the car back now that he fixed it and it looks better.

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. ____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Scenario 3

Federal law requires that news agencies not publish or broadcast information that could threaten the security of the nation's armed forces in times of conflict. However, the Constitution protects the right to free expression of ideas. Judges use past decisions on cases where the law and rights come into conflict to settle similar disputes. In one case, New York Times vs. United States, the Supreme Court decided that a newspaper could publish information about the military that the president said should remain secret to protect the troops. The justices said the president failed to prove that the information could threaten the nation's security.

Federal officials accuse an online newspaper of violating the law against publishing secret information about the military. One of the newspaper's reporters posted comments online about her friend, who is a soldier serving overseas. On her personal website, she posted a picture of him, where he is stationed, and negative opinions of his commanders, including the president. The newspaper insists that the reporter did this on her own time and that the newspaper is not responsible. The reporter maintains that whether at work or not, she has the right to express her opinions freely under the Constitution.

U.S. government officials say that the posting of the information could put the soldier in harm's way. Officials also say that her negative opinions could encourage others to stop supporting the soldiers and break laws in protest. They insist that because a reporter for the newspaper, people could believe that her ideas are those of everyone working for the newspaper. They say the newspaper and the reporter have threatened the safety and security of the armed forces.

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or a combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Do you think the reporter has a valid argument? In other words, should government change the law or make an exception? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. ___________________________________________________________________

Answer 18

oh wow ok

Answer 19

scenario 1 definitely civil

Answer 20

ahh ill get thor maybe he can help you.

Answer 21

ok

Answer 22

@Abhisar

Answer 23

FLVS the struggle lol

Answer 24

1. Civil Law.
2. Statute

Answer 25

3. Not sure but I would say people's safety since they are talking about speed limit. (If a car goes fast on a public road the result can be bad, and is dangerous).

Answer 26

thankyou

Answer 27

lol no problem i know virtual school can be difficult :P :)

Answer 28

oh you are in flvs

Answer 29

what segment

Answer 30

no but I've been there on electives some time ago :)

Answer 31

ok so do I continue answering the rest or can you answer them?

Answer 32

this is civics right?

Answer 33

ok tag me when you come back Im going to go

Answer 34

State law recognizes that the owner of a vehicle is the person or company whose name appears on the title, or legal and official ownership document. The state also recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means.
A young woman says her neighbor agreed to purchase her old car. She agreed to accept payments from him on a monthly basis until he paid off the car and trusted that he would honor this plan. She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car.
The neighbor says he understood the car to be a gift and has no obligation to make payments. He did not sign an official agreement to make payments. He says that she gave him the car in exchange for his electric scooter, which is new and gets great gas mileage. The neighbor maintains she just wants the car back now that he fixed it and it looks better.
Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know?

Answer 35

@Daniellelovee

Answer 36

can you help

Answer 37

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________
Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? Use details from the scenario to support your answer

Answer 38

i can try

Answer 39

@LazyBoy