Question

It cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” Juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.
The terms have no significant difference in meaning. Juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law.
“Not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. However, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.
A jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

Answer 1

@EclipsedStar please help me

Answer 2

What is the question? The post only shows answer choices.

Answer 3

What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent?”

Answer 4

what is the difference between the terms not guilty and innocent?

Answer 5

@EclipsedStar

Answer 6

Ok...have any ideas so far? What do you know aren't true?

Answer 7

d and b

Answer 8

If someone charges you with a certain crime, the jury is there to decide whether you are guilty or not guilt of a crime. Not guilty, on the other hand, can and is used to express specifically what you are not guilty of.

Answer 9

Actually, either D or B is correct.

Answer 10

Which one matches what I gave? :)

Answer 11

oh... and btw i actually was not guessing i thought the answer was a

Answer 12

It's D, not A because juries say people are innocent in court cases, right? :)

Answer 13

yes

Answer 14

You got it :)

Answer 15

are you sure d???

Answer 16

Yes. Why don't you think so?