What would be the strongest evidence to use in support of the argument that all individuals between the ages of 13 and 64 should be tested for HIV? A. Early detection can help the long-term health of a person infected with HIV. B. My friend was afraid to get an HIV test, so testing of all people would help lessen that fear. C. Widespread testing is not necessary, because HIV rates have steadied in recent years. D. More than 250,000 HIV-positive Americans are unaware of their infection (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
Take a guess
Hey there! Welcome to openstudy! consider reading the CoC: http://openstudy.com/code-of-conduct Heres a link that will help you get to know the site better: http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/548c04e1e4b0f2fbdc23dd6c
is it A?
It could be A, but we'll have to look a the other answers first to see if there's a better one. It couldn't be B. This is not evidence, and would not change someone's opinion of making so many people get tested for HIV. It couldn't be C. This supports that people SHOULDN'T be tested for HIV. It could also be D, because this answer gives factual evidence supporting that people should get tested for HIV, AND has a source. So what do you think it is?
D.
Correct !
Yes, good job! While A COULD be used, it is not as strong evidence as D because it does not have a source. :))
D is clear evidence to support the argument.
@Conqueror every medal counts if you almost there.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!