Apparently instigating a discussion in an improper manner is considered "giving a direct answer". So I guess I need to work on my "discussion skills". :l - Also, is posting a link (of the same question) as an answer considered a "direct answer", if the link contains information explaining the answer?
Well, if the link leads the asker to the answer, and does not just give out the answer, then no.
And I did not understand the first sentence... :/
@kittiwitti1
Yes, if the link does not just give out the answer to where they can scroll down and get it, then it is not a direct answer. As for the first sentence... same as @AnswerMyQuestions
She is mad because i told her not give direct answers. She defend saying "All i said was "I think its Pearl Harbor". Not only a direct answer but it was wrong. The asker didn't even participate.
Thank you for clarifying @Joel_the_boss
No problem. @sleepyjess I knew you guys wouldn't understand so i pitched in what had happened.
And just so you know, it is considered a direct answer, being as I got suspended for doing that.
I'm not mad at you Joel, but I defended* myself because that was my intention. And besides my main question *here* is if posting a link with information is considered a direct answer. That was a side inquiry. It's not complaining, that was a topic I'm open to discussing over whether my manner of conduct was inappropriate. I apologize if that appeared to be complaining.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!