Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Answer choices:
Directrix (directrix):
Look at the reason for statement 4.
Directrix (directrix):
@katiekaykay If you come back to the thread, we can finish this.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Is the reason for #4 the same for #6?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Oh wait just kidding, dumb question.
Directrix (directrix):
The reason for statement 4 says what?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Alternate Interior Angle Theorem. which is when two lines are cut cut by a transversal, the alternate interior angles made are congruent?
Directrix (directrix):
Yes. Now, look at statement 3. What are the two angles that are given as being alternate interior angles.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
QRT ans STR
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
and*
Directrix (directrix):
With the angle symbol < in front.
Okay, those are the two angles that are congruent and go in missing statement 4 as being congruent. So, this problem is now half completed.
Directrix (directrix):
The next question is why the two triangles are congruent.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Now we just have to figure out which Congruence Postulate which confuses me so bad