Explain the difference between using the cosine ratio to solve for a missing angle in a right triangle versus using the secant ratio. You must use complete sentences and any evidence needed (such as an example) to prove your point of view
@Mehek14
Thanks! @Mehek14
yw :)
I have another one, I need it explained tho @Mehek14
k I'll see if I can explain
An observer (O) is located 660 feet from a tree (T). The observer notices a hawk (H) flying at a 35° angle of elevation from his line of sight. How high is the hawk flying over the tree? You must show all work and calculations to receive full credit.
Did you find anything when you searched it up?
not how I needed it, I need the steps and the answer
ok I'll see if I can explain it in the simplest way I can
You have the angle 35
you use tan so tan(35)
What is the tan(35), like the equation?
.
tan is the function in which opposite/adjacent sides
the opposite side of 35 is h and the adjacent has the measure of 660
so tan(35) = h/660
okay...
so in all equations, you isolate the variable right?
so since you are dividing h/660 you multiply tan(35) * 660
Okay, is that all? What is the final answer?
@Mehek14
well multiply tan (35) * 660 and you get the answer
definetan please?
Define Tan**
use a scientific calculatorand multiply that
tan is a function in which you solve opposite side/adjacent side?
312.71?
tan (35) = 0.7 0.7*660=462
OHH! thank you!!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!