Question

What was the effect of Korematsu v. United States?

Discrimination ended in war industries.
Internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Japanese Americans returned to their homes.
Executive Order 9022 was overturned.

Answer 1

last two i think...

Answer 2

Ok ty :)

Answer 3

And why is it that one?

Answer 4

What do you think also go with your gut instinct...Give me a min and ill tell you, gotta go find ma books :)

Answer 5

Best i could find from multiple sources is......................nternment Camps are NOT legal.....it did not end discrimination anywhere..... Most of the Japanese involve lost everything and had nowhere to go..... the USA tried to compensate for their violation of the Constitution by paying retribution..... but it failed to compensate for the lives and fortunes destroyed..... and the executive order has NOT been overturned

Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, which ordered Japanese Americans into internment camps during World War II regardless of citizenship.

In a 6-3 decision, the Court sided with the government, ruling that the exclusion order was constitutional. Six of eight Roosevelt nominees sided with Roosevelt. The lone Republican nominee, Owen Roberts dissented. The opinion, written by Supreme Court justice Hugo Black, held that the need to protect against espionage outweighed Fred Korematsu's individual rights, and the rights of Americans of Japanese descent.
During the case, Solicitor General Charles Fahy is alleged to have suppressed evidence by keeping from the Court a report from the Office of Naval Intelligence indicating that there was no evidence that Japanese Americans were acting as spies or sending signals to enemy submarines.

The decision in Korematsu v. United States has been very controversial. Korematsu's conviction for evading internment was overturned on November 10, 1983, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a writ because in Korematsu's original case, the government had knowingly submitted false information to the Supreme Court that had a material effect on the Supreme Court's decision.

The Korematsu decision has not been explicitly overturned, although in 2011 the Department of Justice filed official notice, conceding that it was in error, thus erasing the case's value as precedent for interning citizens.

Answer 6

Medal Please...:)

Answer 7

I did and tyvm

Answer 8

Np...i joined open study to help :)