A student is writing the conclusion to a research-based article about funding for the space program. Which of the following would best conclude that argument? A statement that introduces a new idea A statement that reiterates the significance on the topic A statement that includes a quote from a famous astronaut A statement that explains the student’s interest in the space program
B would be the best answer
Thanks can you help with some more? (:
Yeah i can
To the People of the State of New York: AFTER an unequivocal experience of the inefficiency of the subsisting federal government, you are called upon to deliberate on a new Constitution for the United States of America. The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the UNION, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the fate of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world. It has been frequently remarked that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force. If there be any truth in the remark, the crisis at which we are arrived may with propriety be regarded as the era in which that decision is to be made; and a wrong election of the part we shall act may, in this view, deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind. Among the most formidable of the obstacles which the new Constitution will have to encounter may readily be distinguished the obvious interest of a certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and consequence of the offices they hold under the State establishments; and the perverted ambition of another class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country, or will flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies than from its union under one government. According to Hamilton’s writing in the second paragraph, what is one reason the new Constitution would be opposed? People are interested in everyone being granted equal status. The proposed changes would make it difficult to understand. Individuals who hold positions of importance do not want a stronger government. Too many positions will be open for leaders in the new government.
I think B but i'm not completely sure
Thank you! To the People of the State of New York: AFTER an unequivocal experience of the inefficiency of the subsisting federal government, you are called upon to deliberate on a new Constitution for the United States of America. The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the UNION, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the fate of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world. It has been frequently remarked that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force. If there be any truth in the remark, the crisis at which we are arrived may with propriety be regarded as the era in which that decision is to be made; and a wrong election of the part we shall act may, in this view, deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind. Among the most formidable of the obstacles which the new Constitution will have to encounter may readily be distinguished the obvious interest of a certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and consequence of the offices they hold under the State establishments; and the perverted ambition of another class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country, or will flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies than from its union under one government. Which statement from the second paragraph indicates that Hamilton worries that men will oppose the formation of a stronger government because the confusion of fragmented government gives them a better chance at getting an authority position? Among the most formidable of the obstacles which the new Constitution will have to encounter may readily be distinguished the obvious interest of a certain class of men… …flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies… …the perverted ambition of another class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country… …in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and consequence of the offices they hold under the State establishments… What about this one?
D makes the most sense
Thank you! Read the sentence below and answer the following question: Had I right, for my own benefit, to inflict this curse upon everlasting generations?—Shelley, Frankenstein Which of the following correctly describes the syntax of this excerpt? Ending with the word generations emphasizes the narrator's sense of importance. Placing the phrase had I right at the beginning of the sentence emphasizes the narrator's doubt. Using the verb phrase to inflict emphasizes the painful nature of the narrator's decision. Using the word curse suggests the narrator sees himself as more powerful than he is. What about this one?
I think D but I could be wrong
Thank you! Read this excerpt from “Schenck v. U.S., 249 U.S. 47 (1919)" and answer the question that follows: The document in question upon its first printed side recited the first section of the Thirteenth Amendment, said that the idea embodied in it was violated by the conscription act and that a conscript is little better than a convict. In impassioned language it intimated that conscription was despotism in its worst form and a monstrous wrong against humanity in the interest of Wall Street's chosen few. It said, 'Do not submit to intimidation,' but in form at least confined itself to peaceful measures such as a petition for the repeal of the act. The other and later printed side of the sheet was headed 'Assert Your Rights.' It stated reasons for alleging that any one violated the Constitution when he refused to recognize 'your right to assert your opposition to the draft,' and went on, 'If you do not assert and support your rights, you are helping to deny or disparage rights which it is the solemn duty of all citizens and residents of the United States to retain.' It described the arguments on the other side as coming from cunning politicians and a mercenary capitalist press, and even silent consent to the conscription law as helping to support an infamous conspiracy. According to the protest document, what violates the Constitution? Failure to consent to conscription Confining oneself to peaceful measures Petitioning for a repeal of the conscription act Failure to assert and support your rights What about this one?
D. Failure to assert and support your rights
Thank you! The purpose of the Federalist Papers was to express concern about the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, the document that outlined the first government of the United States of America. Alexander Hamilton, among others, wrote the Federalist Papers to persuade doubtful New Yorkers to vote in favor of the stronger federal government proposed in the United States Constitution. Read this excerpt from Federalist Paper No. 1 and answer the question that follows: Federalist Papers: No. 1 General Introduction For the Independent Journal Author: Alexander Hamilton To the People of the State of New York: AFTER an unequivocal experience of the inefficiency of the subsisting federal government, you are called upon to deliberate on a new Constitution for the United States of America. The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the UNION, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the fate of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world. It has been frequently remarked that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force. If there be any truth in the remark, the crisis at which we are arrived may with propriety be regarded as the era in which that decision is to be made; and a wrong election of the part we shall act may, in this view, deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind. Among the most formidable of the obstacles which the new Constitution will have to encounter may readily be distinguished the obvious interest of a certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and consequence of the offices they hold under the State establishments; and the perverted ambition of another class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country, or will flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies than from its union under one government. Based on this sentence from the first paragraph, why does Hamilton think a stronger government is necessary? The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the UNION, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the fate of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world. The rest of the world will be more successful. The citizens will be in danger. The leaders will not be understood. The country will fall apart without it. What about this one?
D. The country would fall apart without it
Thank you! Read this excerpt from “Schenck v. U.S., 249 U.S. 47 (1919)" and answer the question that follows: This is an indictment in three counts. The first charges a conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of June 15, 1917, by causing and attempting to cause insubordination, in the military and naval forces of the United States, and to obstruct the recruiting and enlistment service of the United States, when the United States was at war with the German Empire, to-wit, that the defendant willfully conspired to have printed and circulated to men who had been called and accepted for military service under the Act of May 18, 1917, a document set forth and alleged to be calculated to cause such insubordination and obstruction. The count alleges overt acts in pursuance of the conspiracy, ending in the distribution of the document set forth. The second count alleges a conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, to-wit, to use the mails for the transmission of matter declared to be non-mailable by title 12, 2, of the Act of June 15, 1917, to-wit, the above mentioned document, with an averment of the same overt acts. The third count charges an unlawful use of the mails for the transmission of the same matter and otherwise as above. The defendants were found guilty on all the counts. They set up the First Amendment to the Constitution forbidding Congress to make any law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, and bringing the case here on that ground have argued some other points also of which we must dispose. According to the lines in bold, what is one reason for Schenck’s indictment? He helped the military publicize their recruiting efforts. He tried to encourage men to sign up for enlistment. He wanted to prevent men from signing up for recruitment. He tried to join the United States Navy. What about this one?
What lines are bold?
This is an indictment in three counts. The first charges a conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of June 15, 1917, by causing and attempting to cause insubordination, in the military and naval forces of the United States, and to obstruct the recruiting and enlistment service of the United States, when the United States was at war with the German Empire
I think it would be c
Thank you! Read this excerpt from Federalist Paper No. 1 and answer the question that follows: Federalist Papers: No. 1 General Introduction For the Independent Journal Author: Alexander Hamilton This idea will add the inducements of philanthropy to those of patriotism, to heighten the solicitude which all considerate and good men must feel for the event. Happy will it be if our choice should be directed by a judicious estimate of our true interests, unperplexed and unbiased by considerations not connected with the public good. But this is a thing more ardently to be wished than seriously to be expected. The plan offered to our deliberations affects too many particular interests, innovates upon too many local institutions, not to involve in its discussion a variety of objects foreign to its merits, and of views, passions and prejudices little favorable to the discovery of truth. Which of the following statements supports the idea presented in this quote from the excerpt? Happy will it be if our choice should be directed by a judicious estimate of our true interests, unperplexed and unbiased by considerations not connected with the public good. Hamilton had many opinions that he put aside to ensure the ratification process could succeed. Hamilton liked the political process despite the petty arguments people got into. Hamilton wished Constitutional reformers would consider only what was best for the public. Hamilton was happy to be a participant in the Constitutional Convention, even though it was quarrelsome. What about this one?
b would be my guess
Thank you! It is not, however, my design to dwell upon observations of this nature. I am well aware that it would be disingenuous to resolve indiscriminately the opposition of any set of men (merely because their situations might subject them to suspicion) into interested or ambitious views. Candor will oblige us to admit that even such men may be actuated by upright intentions; and it cannot be doubted that much of the opposition which has made its appearance, or may hereafter make its appearance, will spring from sources, blameless at least, if not respectable--the honest errors of minds led astray by preconceived jealousies and fears. So numerous indeed and so powerful are the causes which serve to give a false bias to the judgment, that we, upon many occasions, see wise and good men on the wrong as well as on the right side of questions of the first magnitude to society. This circumstance, if duly attended to, would furnish a lesson of moderation to those who are ever so much persuaded of their being in the right in any controversy. And a further reason for caution, in this respect, might be drawn from the reflection that we are not always sure that those who advocate the truth are influenced by purer principles than their antagonists. Ambition, avarice, personal animosity, party opposition, and many other motives not more laudable than these, are apt to operate as well upon those who support as those who oppose the right side of a question. Were there not even these inducements to moderation, nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties. For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution. Which of the following statements supports the idea presented in this quote from the excerpt? Were there not even these inducements to moderation, nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties. Hamilton believed politician's narrow-mindedness would have a negative effect. Hamilton generally disliked politicians even though he was one of them. Hamilton had many reasons to entice politicians to be moderate in their negotiations. Hamilton thought politicians were the last people who should be writing a new Constitution. What about this one?
I think it is A
Thank you! Which of the following would be most reliable source for a research paper explaining the causes for whale and dolphin strandings during the summer? A published article written by a person who worked on a fishing vessel for 20 years A newspaper editorial discussing the consequences of ocean pollution for wildlife An article from Scientific American magazine explaining new findings from recent studies An interview with a person who saw whales stranding themselves on a local beach what about this one?
C is the best answer
Thank you! A student completing research for a project enters the following search terms: Drugs AND prescription AND cost Which of the following best describes the likely results of this search? Sources that reference all three terms Sources that reference either of the three terms Sources that reference drugs and either prescription or cost Sources that reference the first two terms but not the third This one?
C i think not 100% sure tho
A student completing research for a project enters the following search terms: Pets AND diet NOT birds Which of the following best describes the likely results of this search? Sources that reference the diet of pets and birds Sources that reference the diet of birds only Sources that reference the diet of either pets or birds Sources that reference the diet of pets but not birds This one? please
D looks like the best answer
Read these two sentences: I can see the point of those who argue that space projects should be a national priority. I also see the problem with spending millions with so many other social problems that need solving. Which transition word correctly links the two sentences? Consequently Conversely Specifically Regardless Please
Conversly
Conversly
It is not, however, my design to dwell upon observations of this nature. I am well aware that it would be disingenuous to resolve indiscriminately the opposition of any set of men (merely because their situations might subject them to suspicion) into interested or ambitious views. Candor will oblige us to admit that even such men may be actuated by upright intentions; and it cannot be doubted that much of the opposition which has made its appearance, or may hereafter make its appearance, will spring from sources, blameless at least, if not respectable--the honest errors of minds led astray by preconceived jealousies and fears. So numerous indeed and so powerful are the causes which serve to give a false bias to the judgment, that we, upon many occasions, see wise and good men on the wrong as well as on the right side of questions of the first magnitude to society. This circumstance, if duly attended to, would furnish a lesson of moderation to those who are ever so much persuaded of their being in the right in any controversy. And a further reason for caution, in this respect, might be drawn from the reflection that we are not always sure that those who advocate the truth are influenced by purer principles than their antagonists. Ambition, avarice, personal animosity, party opposition, and many other motives not more laudable than these, are apt to operate as well upon those who support as those who oppose the right side of a question. Were there not even these inducements to moderation, nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties. For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution. Which of the following correctly summarizes the main point of this text from the excerpt? And a further reason for caution, in this respect, might be drawn from the reflection that we are not always sure that those who advocate the truth are influenced by purer principles than their antagonists. Enemies will undermine those with good intentions at every turn. In an effort this large, caution is to be remembered in all parts of the process. Many who seem to support moral choices may also have questionable motives. Those on the side of good will always know those who oppose them.\ Please
B I think
Last one :) Which source would provide credible information to use in a writing project focusing on primate research efforts in the United States? A blog by someone who volunteers at a research facility A website that hosts scientists peer-reviewed studies A website hosted by a biology club A wiki site that allows users to post their own research
B is the best answer. Can I ask you something?
Yes go ahead
What english is this?
English 4
Okay thats probably why I didn't completely understand some things lol. I'm only in english 3
That's ok. Thank you very much!!!!!!! Here is your medal.
No problem!! Thanks for the medal!!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!