What is the assumption needed to begin an indirect proof of the following statement?

"An angle bisector separates an angle in two equal parts."

a. An angle bisector seperates an angle in two equal parts.
b. An angle bisector separates an angle in three equal parts.
c. An angle bisector does not separate an angle in three equal parts.
d. An angle bisector does not separate an angle in two equal parts

Question

What is the assumption needed to begin an indirect proof of the following statement?

"An angle bisector separates an angle in two equal parts."

a. An angle bisector seperates an angle in two equal parts. 
b. An angle bisector separates an angle in three equal parts. 
c. An angle bisector does not separate an angle in three equal parts. 
d. An angle bisector does not separate an angle in two equal parts

anonymous · Answer

An angle bisector does not separate an angle in two equal parts.

Indirect Proof: 
Assume what you need to prove is false, and then show that something contradictory (absurd) happens.

anonymous · Answer

Ohhh..

anonymous · Answer

Kylie why are you looking for me? lol

anonymous · Answer

I don't know... lol I just wanted to say hey