Help?
@FibonacciChick666
So, what property do you use to simplify \[-(x+y)+x\] to \[-x-y+x\]
given it says so in the screenshot
no, it's not given
so, the given is what do you need to simplify. the given is your problem that they tell you to do. hence it is 'given' to you. You cannot be given a step to a solution, you must use a property to get the next step
Ah, wait I see what you are doing. The chart reads right to left, so the right side happens before the left column . Think of it as right column, actions, left column, result of action.
example, I "Give" you an apple. You "bite" the apple. The apple is 3/4 the size now. Steps: Justifications Apple Given 3/4 size You take a bite
ok dude I know this is a lot to ask for and I know this is against the coc and you could get in trouble for this but can you please just give me the answers?! It's 11:38 where I live I'm supposed to be sleeping and my head is aching like crap right now and im exhausted. I'm getting the hang of this it's just that I'm not feeling well. If this question puts a pamper in your night I apologize.
I'm sorry you are not feeling well, but no I do not just provide answers.
It's okay....
I get it
If not for missing the given line in your previous post, you had the answers
Hence my confusion as to your confusion.
so you skipped #2 before
what do you mean? i still need the answers to like all the questions I copied the question wrong and the answer I gave were incorrect according to you.
omg my head is about to blow up now I swear
(metaphor)
You copied the problem wrong before.
because of that we essentially started at step #3
You however did not realize this and moved the answers up a level each.
Does it make sense now why I said they were incorrect?
ok let's just do this so I'm pretty sure # 1 is distributive.
If I'm wrong this is just ridiculous
that's #2
flutter!
your labeling it wrong is the issue
#1 is given.
sorry bout that okay so at least I know distributive is #2
what?
yes, now think back to the last post
YOU SAID WAY BE FORE THAT IT WASN"T GIVEN NOW YOURE TELLING ME IT IS!
omg, read the numbers on your screenshot
justification 1. looks like 1)Given 2) 3) 4) 5)
hence #1 is given, #2 is ___
ok so 1 is given 2 is distributive hold on while I think on 3
there we go, and yes, you can do this
additive inverse?
no, how do you go from -x-y+x to -x+x-y?
sorry, I read the lesson and studied real hard for this and still don't get it I'm an idiot...
no your not, you just don't get the dumb chart
you're
commutative??????????
YES
now, how do you go from line 3 to line 4?
ok so I think now 4 is additive inverse and 5 Identity property
|dw:1445403388891:dw|
Yes, you got it!!!!
OMG!!!!!! YOU DONT KNOW HOW RELIEVED I FEEL NOW!!!!!!!
haha, just know you are not stupid. You just had a very poor explanation of how this "proof" works
I CAN SLEEP LOL THANKS! SORRY FOR BEING AN retrice
meh it happens, we all have our moments. I have them anytime a standardized test pops up
I cried over missing two points on an english multiple choice practice test and was a total B to my dad who was trying to help me
ikr lol thanks. I'm in 10th grade
oh at first I thought that by b you meant your grade on the test lol
(I am a teacher, butstill human)
no, I was taking a practice test for this teaching exam. I have really bad test anxiety and gosh, was I a pain in the butt that day
thanks man I really appreciate the help.
np, and so, before you go, did you look at that pic I posted explaining the table?
cause if you get that, you should have no problem doing these in the future
they will rear their nasty head in geometry too :(
i did it is what sort of helped me solve the other questions myself.
good. and yea, worst case scenario, ditch the chart and just write out this is my given_____ in order to go from my given to _____ I used the ______property. And so on and so on. Best of luck! Night! get some sleep!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!