Tom used a photocopier to dilate the design for a monorail track system. The figure below shows the design and its photocopy:
The ratio of BC:FG is 1:2. what is the length, in meters, of side EH on the photocopied image?
is this correct?
@mathmale @ganeshie8
yes, this pellet is absofantastipositivzing correct
can you please explain?
@Michele_Laino
You have the first diagram marked with dimensions, but not the second. Isn't there at least one dimension pertaining to the 2nd? Alternatively, is the first diagram to be enlarged or made smaller? If so, by what factor? For example, should the copy be twice as large as the original? Note that the angles inside the figures will not change if you enlarge or make smaller the diagrams.
heres a screen shot of it, the second one has no sides marked with any length :(
@mathmale
@amistre64 @Michele_Laino @mathmale @ganeshie8 @goopyfish908
@ikram002p
sorry if i mass tagged i just really am confused with this question
please keep in mind that we have this: \[\huge \frac{{AD}}{{EH}} = \frac{1}{2}\]
thats the ratio, right?
yes!
I reviewed the problem and see that there is a statement saying that the size ratio is 1:2. That means every side in the 2nd figure is 2x as large as its corresponding side in the first. Does that help?
this is equivalent to saying that the 1st figure is half the size of the 2nd figure.
so i multiply side AD by 2?
Side AD is 7m. Yes, exactly.
so 7 * 2 = 14 and 14 is = EH?
that's right!
Yes.
because i found this question and it states otherwise
this is why i was so lost lol
ohhhhhhhhhh i just realized the measurments are different!
XD haha okay i was just lost, thank you very much, all of you! :)
thanks for your perseverance!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!