Fill in the missing reasons to complete the proof. Given:
I Need help for Number 3 And 6
@alerion99
3. <T = <VUY because UY parallel TX
what theorem is it @jhonyy9
this is called corresponding angles
@BrandonA17 This fill-in-the-blank proof has given me a headache. To my thinking, statement #2 does not follow from statement #1. Angles <VUY and <X are not corresponding angles formed by one transversal crossing segments UW and XY. The proof runs amok at that point. Whoever wrote the statements or perhaps drew the picture, messed up. That said, you still have the task of cranking out two missing steps. If you look at problem #48 this link: http://mrdavismathcorner.weebly.com/uploads/2/3/8/1/23817735/chapter_4_worksheet.pdf you will see this problem. Move to the end of the same .pdf and you will see what the person who messed up this proof "thinks" are the two missing steps which you are to provide. 3) Corresponding Angles Postulate and 6) Converse of Isosceles Triangle Theorem I am not saying that those "answers" are correct. I am saying that I think that the creator of this problem most likely programmed those answers to be correct.
Thank u so much
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!