http://x3.jupiterfiles.com/m80494/2042087018/test_23.jpg
If you'd please think about this problem, and write down some ideas for approaching it, and show any calculations you do, then others and I would be happy to give you feedback on your work.
i already did it but its on the computer i am just not sure if its right
here are the my answer i am not sure please HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
anyone want to help me out please????
you have to start with the given, then show the congruent triangles from those things, you cant start with the conclusion
A -- HF=HT, that is the first sentence in the thing
B -- given, the second sentence says just that stuff
ohhhh
remember reflexive is like saying the obvious , like a = a
i am pretty sure c is right??? right?
yeah same shared side, reflexive, they are the same length of course
so now you have 2 sides and an angle that are the same, you can say congruent triangles now from the side-angle - side SAS rule.. remember that
so d is SAS side
no, D is a statement, E is the reason D--congruent triangle, like you have in A now E-- because of SAS rule
oh so d is fs=st that proves its sas for e
no, it already has the SAS from the given information, now you can say THS=FHS congruent triangles for D
because of SAS, that is E
oh i see it now
then, now that you showed the triangles are congruent, the third unknown sides FS and ST must be the same
because of CPCF, i forget what that stands for, corresponding sides of congruent triangles are ...
congruent
you have to start with nothing, and move logically to the conclusion using only what is given
i am pretty sure cpcf is g becuase my teacher told me it can only be a prove not a statement
yes, that is the reason you can say F -- HT = HF because G -- corresonding sides of congruent triangles are the same, CPCF thing
wait so a is not ht=hf???
oh, sorry, mistyped the last thing F -- FS = ST thine thing you are trying to get to
|dw:1451707366456:dw|
oh i get it now
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!