Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 16 Online
OpenStudy (courtney233):

Some historians have defined the historical period of the 1960s and 1970s as a watershed moment in US history because it represents critical change. The emergence of movements for equality, a well-organized political activist youth culture, and a counterculture that rebelled against established norms in society are all factors that highlight this change. Is there a single person or event you think exemplifies the changing US society of the 1960s and 1970s? Explain your choice and why you chose it. Or, explain why you think no single person or event exemplifies this period. Then, name an event

OpenStudy (courtney233):

@KamiBug any help in history

OpenStudy (courtney233):

@JFraser

OpenStudy (jfraser):

I'm no use in history, sorry

OpenStudy (courtney233):

IT IS OK THANKS THO .

OpenStudy (courtney233):

@ILovePuppiesLol

ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):

i am use in history ;)

ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):

ok just a couple people from those times, elvis presley, beatles, etc, new age in music, some events were, gay rights movements gaining popularity, nixon became president, vietnam war was happening, AND DONT FORGET THE SPACE RACE, and the cuban missile crisis

ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):

MLK and robert kennedy

ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):

were assassinated

OpenStudy (courtney233):

thank you sooo much @ILovePuppiesLol

ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):

neil armstrong, first man on moon, bunch of serial killers, like zodiac killer, major civil rights movements, etc, lol glad i helped

OpenStudy (courtney233):

you wanna help with more lol? i suck at history

ILovePuppiesLol (ilovepuppieslol):

sure

OpenStudy (courtney233):

One could argue that since the beginning of the 1980s, the United States has become increasingly influenced by international events and their effects on international diplomacy. The ending of the Cold War, retaining a position as the remaining superpower, and the beginnings of a worldwide war on terror have been important to any study of contemporary US history. When President George W. Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein in 2003, he took a unilateral military action. His stated purpose was to increase US national security. Presidents Clinton and Obama favored more multilateral efforts when intervening in countries such as Kosovo and Libya. Is there a justification for the US to engage in unilateral rather than multilateral military action overseas?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!