Question

will give medal and fan!
How was the Civil Rights Movement both violent and nonviolent? Which was more effective?

Answer 1

It was violent due to racism in the south consequently, they believed some changes might be made if enough people outside the South witnessed the violence blacks had experienced for decades.

The leaders of the Civil Rights Movement chose the tactic of nonviolence as a tool to dismantle institutionalized racial segregation, discrimination, and inequality. Following Martin Luther King Jr.'s ideological principles of nonviolence and passive resistance.

Answer 2

The larger Civil Rights Movement can attribute its success to the tactic of nonviolence contrasting with the exposure of violence-prone policemen, sheriffs, vigilante groups, and other defenders of the status quo. Yet, the tactic of armed self-defense was indispensable in order to protect lives and property since the courts and law enforcement officials often stood silent or protected the perpetrators of racist violence. Thus, blacks and their supporters were compelled to fight the evils of segregation with nonviolence as well as with force. While this may seem paradoxical, it worked to advance their struggle for freedom, equality, and justice.

Answer 3

Hope this helps.