please help , I'll fan and medal.

Paul observes that / and concludes that / and / must be tangent to the circle. What is wrong with Paul's reasoning?

A. Nothing; Paul is correct.
B. The radius of the circle is unknown, so / and / can't be tangent to the circle.
C. There is no indication that / and / are perpendicular to the radii at the points of intersection with the circle.
D. The lengths of / and / aren't given, so Paul can't conclude they are congruent.
/

Question

please help , I'll fan and medal.

Paul observes that / and concludes that / and / must be tangent to the circle. What is wrong with Paul's reasoning?

A. Nothing; Paul is correct. 
B. The radius of the circle is unknown, so / and / can't be tangent to the circle. 
C. There is no indication that / and / are perpendicular to the radii at the points of intersection with the circle. 
D. The lengths of / and / aren't given, so Paul can't conclude they are congruent. 
/

fabianfabian · Answer

|dw:1464713233413:dw|