Which biconditional is not a good definition? A. Two angles are supplementary if and only if the sum of their angles measure 180. B. Two angles are vertical angles if and only if they are nonadjacent and are formed by two intersecting lines. C. Two angles from a linear lair if and only if the angles are adjacent. D. The sum of two angles is 90 if and only if they are complementary
What you got?
I think it's B
why?
Because the word nonadjacent? It's the only one that doesn't make complete sense.
So it's not b?
Really I am not sure. You choose, I check ;)
:(
Don't be sad!
It is not the end of the life!
Let's think by Exclusion! ok? what about A ?
A is correct
It's definition is anyways. supplementary angles equal 180
Nice! b?
ok let b now c?
Im not sure about c
I know it has to have adjacent pairs whose uncommon sides are opposite rays
And I know d is correct because complementary angles equal 90
@mathmate
So A and D are correct, so we are thinking between C and B!
@triciaal
Two angles from a linear lair if and only if the angles are adjacent. pair or lair?
Pair sorry
Ok That makes sense!
Take a look http://www.regentsprep.org/regents/math/geometry/gp5/langles.htm http://www.uhigh.ilstu.edu/math/sondgeroth/geom/07%20geom%20review%2003.htm then decide
I think it's b because doesn't a vertical angle have to be supplementary?
It was an emergency call. sorry
Hey hey I got it It is C Forgive me for being late!
@BuckyBarnes
The choice that has not a good definition (insufficient conditions) is C WHY? Because this is the correct one: Two angles form a linear pair if and only if they are adjacent and their non-common sides form a pair of opposite rays.
I hope you got it.
What does nonadjacent mean?
|dw:1475366950124:dw|
For angles a and b, there are linear pair of angles as the other sides of the angles (AB and BC) form a pair of opposite rays, which does not satisfied in EF and FG (these are not opposite rays) |dw:1475367294012:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!