Question

Please check:

Judicial review is a form of __________ because it involves interpretation of laws.

a. interest articulation
b. interest aggregation
c. policy adjudication

My answer: C

Which example supposes a belief in a consensual party system?

a. the Great Purges in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin
b. Tony Blair calling for a Third Way between socialism and capitalism
c. a majority of Germans supporting Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in the 1930s

My answer: C

Answer 1

@wwhitlock @osprey

Answer 2

since the opening line contains "judicial" and C says adjudication, I'd go for C. I've no real idea about the q other than that though.

Second one is a tad harder. So, here's my GUESS
Stalin was a dictator, among other things. I believe he did something with the notorious "GULAGS" in the then Soviet Tundra that was Siberia (eg"One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich" by Alexander Solzhenytsin, Nobel). Probably didn't go too much on "consensunsuality".

The Hitler one is difficult. Partly because of the date quoted in the q. This was presumably when AH was on his mercilessly relentless rise to power and all the organisations associated with "The Third Reich" were being assembled. It MAY be the case that AH and his "colleagues" had a relatively simple policy towards those who did NOT agree with him. And that policy was either to imprison them or kill them. I believe that he dispatched a lot of communists by murdering them, and the persecution of the Jews (kristalnacht - when all the Jewish shops and traders were attacked and books burned) is harrowingly notorious.
So, I'd tend to think that the "consensuality" was with those who were left after the murdering of the ones that weren't "consensual", and could also have been some sort o case of "crowd hysteria" (Nuremberg rallies etc) and other forms of attempted brainwashing and manipulation.

Which leaves Blair."Calling for" suggests a request to get consensuality, and in any case, Blair was operating within a nominal democracy. There's not much evidence of people sponsored by the state going round persecuting people in public and physically. (The "persecution" could happen in other ways, though, such as arranging policies which cause people great distress. Eg of this recently has been the controversial welfare policies over the last few years in UK).
So, although Blair proved to be controversial - even to this day, witness the Chilcott Inquiry - he was operating within a nominally consensual democracy.
And, that mouthful is why I'd go for B.