Hamilton’s financial plan and the argument that the Constitution gives presidents whatever powers “are necessary and proper” are examples of which type of constitutional interpretation?

Question

rootbeer003 · Answer

@Vocaloid

rootbeer003 · Answer

Loose
	
Strict
	
Forwards
	
Backwards

Vocaloid · Answer

@Eiwoh2

Vocaloid · Answer

well there's only two possibilities, "fowards" and "backwards" interpretations aren't really a thing IIRC

so between "strict" and "loose" it makes sense, that, because this is the elastic clause, it would be a loose interpretation

Vocaloid · Answer

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/nec&proper.html

rootbeer003 · Answer

so loose is yuh guess

Vocaloid · Answer

[that's my best guess as a non-history person, and some research]

Eiwoh2 · Answer

At least you explained it well. ^^;

Allison · Answer

Strict is someone who argues a narrow interpretation of the Constitution's porivsions in particular those granting powers to the Federal Government. So cross that out.

rootbeer003 · Answer

okay lets see if you're correct

Allison · Answer

*Crosses fingers* o.o

rootbeer003 · Answer

oh it doesnt even show but anyway thanks guys

Allison · Answer

Did you get a good grade?!

rootbeer003 · Answer

B

rootbeer003 · Answer

good enough for this class lol

Allison · Answer

:']