Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 30 Online
princeevee:

i need some answers checked 2: Electric boogaloo

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

if they're both parallel to a third line that means lines1 and 2 must be parallel to each other, so true

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

huh the postulate normally assumes that you know the lines are parallel we don't know that yet, so we are stating that 2 is congruent to 6 6 is congruent to 8 therefore 2 is congruent to 8 which should be the transitive property

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

in general consecutive interior angles are not congruent, they'd be supplementary so false

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

hm, not quite, 6 and 12 are not corresponding angles (they would have to be in the same position and orientation) notice how 6 and 12 are on the outside side of the parallel lines, making them interior or exterior?

princeevee:

exterior

Vocaloid:

good so B

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

hm not quite CE = ED 5x + 80 = 7x - 2 solve for x, then plug back into AE = 4x + 5

princeevee:

x=41

Vocaloid:

good now plug that into 4x + 5

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

may I see what the proof is?

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

hm not quite 3x - 30 = 90 since its a right angle solve for x

princeevee:

40

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

|dw:1529873599319:dw| not quite, they don't have to be perpendicular, the angles just have to add up t o 180

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

hm x = 41 right so CE = 285 CD = 2*CE = 570 to account for both sides of the rectangle 570 + 570 = 1140 applying this same logic to AE AE = 169 AB = 2*169 = 338 338 + 338 = 676 so 1140 + 676 = 1816 (A)

Vocaloid:

basically your previous answer only accounted for half the perimeter

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

since the end of the fence makes 90 degree angles w/ the sides of the fence by definition the sides of the fence are perpendicular to the end fence so B can't be the solution (we are looking for a false statement) any other ideas?

princeevee:

A?

Vocaloid:

if the rows of crops are parallel to the sides and the sides are perpendicular to the end of the fence therefore the rows of crops are perpendicular to the end of the fence making A a true statement so it cannot be the solution

Vocaloid:

let's look at statement C the original problem never states that rows of crops are parallel to the sides of the fence making C the solution

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

hm, not quite AE is 169 but it's asking for CD we solved that x = 41 right? so CD = 5x + 80 + 7x - 2 = ?

princeevee:

570

Vocaloid:

good so 570 = your sol'n

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

|dw:1529876293655:dw| if its perpendicular to the first line it has to be perpendicular to the second line if the two lines are parallel so true

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

because <1 and <2 are in the same orientation with respect to the transversal they are ~corresponding angles~

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

|dw:1529876838710:dw| not quite there's only one possible line that can be drawn through P and be perp. to line l

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

for a y-intercept, the x-coordinate must be 0 so it can't be A

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

hm not quite to find the y-intercept, let x = 0 and solve for y in 3x + 4y = 12

princeevee:

4.

Vocaloid:

3(0) + 4y = 12 4y = 12 y = ?

princeevee:

8

Vocaloid:

4 is being multiplied by y so you have to divide both sides by 4 not subtract

princeevee:

3.

Vocaloid:

good so 3 = your sol'n

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

hang on, i actually think this is zero

Vocaloid:

a horizontal line has slope 0 not undefined

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

hm not quite remember that a vertical line only has an x not a y take the standard form equation Ax + By = C and replace y with 0

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

|dw:1529878258957:dw| |dw:1529878273213:dw| try to apply this logic to your problem to calculate the slope m

princeevee:

so just 8/-2

princeevee:

-4

Vocaloid:

careful with your signs (8-0)/(0 - (-2)) = 8/2 not 8/-2 so 4 not -4

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

that's point slope form standard form should look like Ax + By = C

princeevee:

so D

Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

not quite if the equation is y = mx that means it has to pass through the point (0,0)

Vocaloid:

which of the four lines crosses the origin?

Vocaloid:

notice how only b crosses (0,0) so only line b can be the correct sol'n

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
YoungBlood: STOP THE YELLOW NAME TAG SLANDER!
4 hours ago 11 Replies 2 Medals
Bubblezz: Art for @euphoriiic
7 hours ago 23 Replies 3 Medals
ilovemybf: i need more drawing ideas
8 hours ago 15 Replies 1 Medal
toga: what is a Mayuri
12 hours ago 3 Replies 1 Medal
Midnight97: Here is a beat I made let me know what y'all think
12 hours ago 24 Replies 2 Medals
toga: who thinks that there should be more titles
13 hours ago 5 Replies 0 Medals
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!