Question

Math help please, will medal-
1. http://prntscr.com/l6w2ba
2.http://prntscr.com/l7575c

Answer 1

@Angle

Answer 2

What did you get for the others?

Answer 3

as far as question 1?

Answer 4

ye for question 1

Answer 5

give me a moment.

Answer 6

first pair is AAA(Or possibly) HL
Second pair-SSS?
Third pair-NA
Fourth pair-SSS

Answer 7

second pair is wrong, dont mind that. ill try to correct it in a second

Answer 8

second pair-
fifth pair- SAS
Sixth pair- ???
seventh pair-AAS

Answer 9

second might be SAS

Answer 10

AAA can not be used.

Answer 11

thats the answer shadow came up with. so hmm

Answer 12

hrm i thought AAA and SSA couldnt be used, if shadow said otherwise then go with what he said.

Answer 13

but the question is can HL be used in any of this

Answer 14

HL can be used for the 2nd one.

Answer 15

i see why now so HL for second.

Answer 16

mhm

Answer 17

4th one is correct, 5th is incorrect you would define it by AAS theorem. you know a 2nd angle by the vertical angle theorem meaning `angle o = angle o`.

Answer 18

hm. ok then

Answer 19

make sure to mark the vertical angles, it says so in your question.

Answer 20

The 6th pair is defined by SAS Theorem. The triangles are alike but one is simply reflected.

Answer 21

7th one, you are correct on there being 2 congruent angles and one congruent side pair but it would not be AAS, look how the angles and side is. The side is contained within the congruent angles, this means it is defined by `ASA`

Answer 22

i assume the third one is correct because there is no given information whatsoever

Answer 23

hrm

Answer 24

The 1st one and the 3rd one confuse me, cause youll assume by AAA but AAA is not a rule for proving congruency.

Answer 25

its not AAA

Answer 26

for the first

Answer 27

oh what did you put?

Answer 28

i feel the most logical answer for the first is ASA

Answer 29

wait wait

Answer 30

SAS

Answer 31

but no side is determined congruent. I would go with NA

do you agree @dude ?

Answer 32

actually i can see it being NA as well as 3

Answer 33

so ima just look at 3 and tell you why from my own view, it might be wrong but w/e i tried

Answer 34

i would say NA for the 1st one and the 3rd one too.

Answer 35

there are 3 angles on 3, AAA cant be used what so ever

Answer 36

mhm

Answer 37

basically no sides to it

Answer 38

1 is tough because looking at it, it could be HL but on the top it has an angle

Answer 39

in order for the first pair to be correct you would either have to remove the 90 degree sign from it alltogether and then it possibly could be something like ASA

Answer 40

just by the angle being there it blows it completely out of proportion

Answer 41

HL can only be used unless the hypotenuse is defined as congruent to the corresponding hypotenuse.

Answer 42

so here is what it looks like http://prntscr.com/l76ziu

Answer 43

i can edit the images with the angles and sides later, i have other math work to do.

Answer 44

dat looks right

Answer 45

For your 2nd problem the 1st reason is given, because you are told this problem.

Answer 46

now you follow by PEMDAS, you need to simplify the paranthesis so how would you do this?

Answer 47

by using addition properity of equality?

Answer 48

not quiet, you have \(\bf{6x=3(x+4)}\) you need to first deal wid da parenthesis BUT you see that 3 is being multipled by the parenthesis, so you have to deal wid da multiplication first. What property is this?

Answer 49

multiplication property of equality

Answer 50

mm your in the right direction, we have to apply the 3 into the parenthesis, so we distribute it. We follow by `Distributive Property of Equality`.

Answer 51

Ah

Answer 52

`Distributive Property of Equality` goes by:

\(\large\bf{a(b+c)=ab+ac}\)

Answer 53

Now we need to get the variable to one side, so in your 3rd statment you seem to be subtracting 3x from each side, what property is this?

Answer 54

subtraction property of equality

Answer 55

correct.

now what would you label the 4th step? nothing seems to be done only that it simplified. So how would you label the reasoning?

Answer 56

divide 3 on each side?

Answer 57

wait

Answer 58

division property of equality

Answer 59

mm thats the 5th one

Answer 60

4 and 6 would just be defined as `simplify` because the step before you already stated what you are doing.

Answer 61

oh.

Answer 62

i get it now.

Answer 63

i have other questions that im doing so would you mind checking them to see if they are exceptional when im done with them?

Answer 64

mm sure