http://prntscr.com/s1yt7m
@Vocaloid @Hero @silvernight269
maybe you're right @Hero but can't we infer that the ratios are similar due to the sides that are given?
I goofed up on that. @HanAkoSolo you're free to continue helping @Nicole
hi @Nicole ! Still there? What you want to do here is figure out what side corresponds to what side, since these two shapes are similar yet not congruent. Then, figure out what factor the shape has grown/shrank by.
For the sake of this question, it's probably easiest to look at line segments' BC and GF, for example. What do you notice about these?
Yes I'm here They are equal
Not entirely! Shapes are only equal if they are the exact same size and shape. These two shapes are similar. Meaning, if you figure out which side corresponds to what side of the similar shape, you can determine the ratios used to shrink the original shape, which would be ABCD for the sake of this problem.
BC is 15 units long, while GF is 7.5 units long. So what was mathematically done to 15 in order to shrink t to 7.5? I'll give you a hint: Try division!
15 divided by 7.5? Which would be 2
Correct! Now you know that the shape has been shrunk down by a factor of two. Does that make sense so far? @Nicole
Yes I think I got that part
Now if we're looking for CD, we have to find the side on shape EFGH that corresponds to CD. Which would be?
GH
right! And GH is 4, right? So this time, we're not dividing but we're multiplying by 2 in order to ratios of the original, bigger shape.
Which would be 8
So basically, multiple 4 by 2 and you should have your answer! Does that make sense?
Yes girl! <3
Okay got it that makes sense now thank youuu <3
You are so welcome :)
Is there a way you can help me out with another question?
If you can
Sure! Just go ahead and open a new one, I'm not busy at the moment
Okay
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!