Question

Charles Schenck, a U.S. citizen, was responsible for printing and distributing leaflets that explained why he was against the draft (required military service) during World War I. He was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917, a federal law that outlawed any action that got in the way of military operations. Charles believed that the law in question violated his right to free speech. In which court would this case be tried, and why?

A state court because it involved violation of criminal law.
The Supreme Court of the United States because it involved constitutional law.
A county civil court because it involved violation of civil liberties.
A military tribunal because the matter involved prospective military draftees.

Answer 1

I think its B

Answer 2

I think it is B because it involved a constitutional law.

Answer 3

ok so he thought it violated his freedom of speech, which is a right in the bill of rights.
We know that the Supreme Court hears cases and decides if they violate the constitution.
In this case,he felt as if it violated his right guaranteed by the Constitution.
This means we are getting rid of options C and D.
Then between A and B, you can use what i said above to further prove it is going to be the Supreme Court

Answer 4

Yh, i b makes the most sense.

Answer 5

B makes the most sense*

Answer 6

yes