Question

x y
3 10
20
In the table, the relation (x, y) is not a function if the missing value of x is
.

Answer 1

the 20 is in the right spot

Answer 2

linear function?

Answer 3

I meant is this function proportional

Answer 4

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @darkknight
I meant is this function proportional
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
wait wym by dat

Answer 5

Major hint: a relation is *not* a function if one input leads to multiple outputs at once

So which x-value would make the relation *not* a function?

Answer 6

we are not quite understanding the table, mind uploading it (attach file button)

Answer 7

@darkknight re-read pls the text - there say about missing value of x

Answer 8

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @jhonyy9
Created with Raphaëlxy31020?Reply Using Drawing
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
yea dats how it look

Answer 9

ah my b
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) Vocaloid
Major hint: a relation is *not* a function if one input leads to multiple outputs at once

So which x-value would make the relation *not* a function?
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
she said this hint perfectly

Answer 10

so i think you can use the rule of 3 simple and write in this way

when x = 3 result y =10
so for x = ,,a" result y = 20

cross multiplie and calcule ,,a"

a = 20*3/10 = 60/10 = 6

for x = 6 will be y = 20

hope helped easy understandably

Answer 11

@Vocaloid

Answer 12

Keep in mind what the question is asking

It’s not asking us to calculate a missing value that would complete a linear relationship

It’s asking for an x-value that would make the relation *not* a function

Answer 13

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Vocaloid
Keep in mind what the question is asking

It’s not asking us to calculate a missing value that would complete a linear relationship

It’s asking for an x-value that would make the relation *not* a function
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
they have a good point

Answer 14

This is hard to explain without giving it away, but think about what would happen if we tried assigning x = 3 to another value in addition to y = 10

Answer 15

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Vocaloid
This is hard to explain without giving it away, but think about what would happen if we tried assigning x = 3 to another value in addition to y = 10
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
you tryna say i need to multiple

Answer 16

You don’t need to calculate anything for this problem

Notice how x = 3 is assigned to y = 10

If we also assign x = 3 to y = 20, it’s not a function anymore, because we assigned multiple outputs (y = 10 and y = 20) to the same input (x = 3)

Answer 17

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Vocaloid
You don’t need to calculate anything for this problem

Notice how x = 3 is assigned to y = 10

If we also assign x = 3 to y = 20, it’s not a function anymore, because we assigned multiple outputs (y = 10 and y = 20) to the same input (x = 3)
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
im confused

Answer 18

Look at the first row of the table

x = 3 matches with y = 10

Now look at the second row of the table

x = ? And y = 20

If we let “?” be 3

That means x = 3 goes with y = 10 AND y = 20 at the same time

This violates our rule about functions (each x value can only match with one y value at a time)

Answer 19

Since the question is asking what missing x-value will make the relation *not* a function, that means our missing value is x = 3

Answer 20

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Vocaloid
Since the question is asking what missing x-value will make the relation *not* a function, that means our missing value is x = 3
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
oh okay i gotchu

Answer 21

ty. @Vocaloid this is clearly now