Sam posted a series of hateful comments on a social media site. The social media site banned Sam. Sam argues this is a violation of his First Amendment right to free speech and he should be allowed back on the social media site. Did the social media site violate Sam's constitutional right to free speech? Yes; the First Amendment clearly states speech is a protected right. Social media is a form of speech that cannot be limited. No; the First Amendment prevents the government from limiting Sam's speech. Private companies can decide what speech is acceptable on their social media site. Yes; the First Amendment protects Sam's right to speak freely on social media. This right cannot be limited by government or a company like a social media site. No; the First Amendment protects the right of the press to speak freely. Private citizens like Sam are not protected.
which one do u think is right? A, B, C, or D
I think it is A but I have a really hard time in this class
ok thank you so much =D
ur welcome
Actually @marbles30 that's not correct
Think about when Twitter/Facebook and other social media websites banned former President Trump
What do you think the answer would be knowing that these social media websites were able to ban/suspend a person off of their website (and not just any person, but the President (at the time) lol)
I think it would be B then it makes the most sense to me
And that's your answer!
You have free speech wherever you are, but social media wants to control what you say.
Thank you!!!
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Marbles30 Thank you!!! \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) You're welcome!
Also, I'll just throw this link for all those who keep trying to say that freedom of speech is absolute. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-first-amendment-where-it-is-3482126/
It was right!!!
I'm glad you trusted me :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!