How would you describe the nature of the Zulu Empire under Shaka?
a few moments ago
Zulus Fight the British From the late 1700s to the late 1800s, a series of local wars shook southern Africa. Around 1816, a Zulu chief, Shaka, used highly disci- plined warriors and good military organization to create a large centralized state.
Shaka’s successors, however, were unable to keep the kingdom together against the superior arms of the British invaders. In 1879, after Zulu king Cetshwayo refused to dismiss his army and accept British rule, the British invaded the Zulu nation. Although the Zulus used spears and shields against British guns, they nearly defeated the great European army. In July 1879, however, the Zulus lost the Battle of Ulundi and their kingdom. The Zulu nation fell to British control in 1887.

Question

russianmafiya · Answer

plzzz help me

Laylalyssa · Answer

$\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}$ @russianmafiya
@Laylalyssa
$\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}$
No, find someone else.

russianmafiya · Answer

@dude

ScamTheMan · Answer

Well, it seems as if the Zulu Empire under Shaka was a centralized power with disciplined rules.  Before the whole state was in shambles and having internal conflicts and struggles.  Shake unified the state and organized it to become something of an actual unified city state.  Centralized States are a much larger force to be reckoned with since they have centralized power and aren't just running all over the place.  It can be assumed if Shaka's successors were just a bit more organized and took the same care and standpoint as Shaka, they might've stood a chance against the British Invaders.