Question

1.Is it proper to cross- examine for the purpose of discrediting there liability or credibility of an adverse witness whom you know to be telling the truth?

Answer 1

So do u have like a screenshot of the analysis

Answer 2

Is this opinion based, in your opinion,or is this asked after reading an article or something

Answer 3

Yh wht he said

Answer 4

Firstly, I'm a she-
Secondly, that's repeating, which is spam-

Answer 5

Ugh this website is just full of spam surprises

Answer 6

It is based off of not opinion but educated guess but more of like a judge of character there for I have no clue how to answer it ._. @snowflake0531

Answer 7

"judge of character"??????
This is like an essay prompt, "character"?

Answer 8

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @snowflake0531
"judge of character"??????
This is like an essay prompt, "character"?
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
Lmao no, it is character as in like your morals, like would you save a kitten or your phone from a truck type morals

Answer 9

Do you have a guess or-?

Answer 10

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @boredfr
It is based off of not opinion but educated guess but more of like a judge of character there for I have no clue how to answer it ._. @snowflake0531
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
@Shayla

Answer 11

got the answer?

Answer 12

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @hamidiso23
got the answer?
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
No?

Answer 13

ight

Answer 14

crissyyyyyyyy idk how to help chu ;-;

Answer 15

Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination. Leading questions may be asked during cross-examination, since the purpose of cross-examination is to test the credibility of statements made during direct examination.

Answer 16

ight

Answer 17

Cite the source next time. Anyways Crissy, so in the response given by Classix, it shows that cross-examination is meant to test the credibility of something. I think if you know a witness is telling the truth, you shouldn't really try and discredit that. When taking the stand, one must take an oath to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Cross-examination is kind of like a way to make someone slip up if they're not being honest. It's like a double check on things to verify the story in which they are telling is accurate. So, if I was answering this, since you said it's more of a judge of character, i'd say that no, it's not proper. If you aren't sure if a witness is telling the truth, then I think that trying to discredit their story could be a good tactic for a lawyer.