can someone please help me with this matrix?
I would suggest clicking the need help button first, then asking for assistance. I'm sure it will walk you through it.
I’m on my phone, so this is hard to type out, but you need to use row reduction to get the left three columns to be 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 When done properly, you’ll end up with the solutions for x, y and z in the last column in that order
You are allowed to: 1. Swap rows 2. Multiply rows by some constant 3. Add/subtract a multiple of a row to another row (ex: replace row 1 with “row 1 + 2row3”) I would start off by swapping rows 2 and 3 to get 1 2 5 -9 0 -1 -3 5 2 -2 4 -12 Now I have 2 in the lower left, but I want 0 there. So I would replace row 3 with (row 3 - 2row1) to get 1 2 5 -9 0 -1 -3 5 0 -6 6 6 And keep going (I would next do another operation with row 3 to get that -6 to a 0)
*made a typo, should be 15 not 5 in last column
@vocaloid can you times row 3 by 0?
@ilovespaghetti the help button only directs you to a problem solved in the textbook with no explanation or steps, just the answer, which doesnt really help at all.
could i multiply by a fraction? so for R3 i could times it by 1/7 or does it have to be a whole number?
I should have mentioned this - multiplying an entire row by 0 is not useful, since you still need some nonzero number in there to represent the variable think about an equation - multiplying both sides by 0 is not useful since it just makes both sides 0 = 0 multiplying both sides by a fraction is fine
1 2 5 -9 0 -1 -3 15 0 -6 6 6 to get that -6 in row 3 column 2 to a 0, I would replace row 3 with row 3 - 6(row2)
alternatively - to make the arithmetic easier, you could divide row 3 by -1 first to get 0 1 - 1 -1, then replace row 3 with row 3 + row 2 to get that 0 there too
god how do you know what steps to use?
@vocaloid for the first method you listed (R3 - 6R2), the 1 is supposed to be negative, so when subtracted 6 from -6, you get 12, right?
It’s a little hard to explain but you want to place the 0’s strategically to make the arithmetic easier Because I want a 0 in row 3 column 2: row 3 has a negative 6 there, so I need to add 6 to get 0 Multiplying row 2 by 6 gets a negative 6 in the center of the matrix So when we do row 3 - 6row(2) we get -6 - 6(-1) = 0 in that space
sorry for late reply, can you check over this work? the program is still saying its wrong but im not seeing the mistake i made, but im sure you'll be able to @vocaloid
third step R3 + 6R2 --> R3 looking at the last entry of row 3, -6 + 6(-3) is -24 not -12 (that's not necessarily the only mistake, just the first one I saw) however, I think if you go to that step, and instead divide row 3 by -6 to get 0 1 1 -1, it'll make the arithmetic in future steps easier
alternatively, you could instead do the R3 + 6R2 --> R3 like you were doing before, then just divide the whole row by the appropriate constant to get 1 in row 3 column 3, to make future arithmetic easier idk, it doesn't *really* matter either way as long as you follow the rules properly, it's just that certain steps make the numbers smaller and easier to work with
oh my god @vocaloid i think ive spent literal hours on this one question, but i finally solved it! i got through every single homework within my unit but for some reason i couldn't wrap my head around how this type of problem works... my midterm on monday only requires us to do one step of a gaussian problem but i was determined to solve this it was driving me actually nuts thanks for the help, i can sleep peacefully now knowing i figured it out lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!